Before you apply Property tax name transfer
Property tax name transfer · your situation
A successor seeks mutation after the recorded owner or occupier dies.
Your next step
Our research left 2 requirements for this situation unresolved in the public record. Take the clarification below to the responsible office and get the current position in writing before you submit anything.
Responsible on the public record: Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike / Bengaluru City Corporations Revenue Department, Greater Bengaluru Authority / Bengaluru City Corporations e-Aasthi. We did not confirm that any of them decide this particular case.
Block one
Found in public documents, graded and dated. The statements closest to your situation come first; a single first-person account never outranks the documentary record. Open any source to read it yourself.
Rule 10 of the BBMP Property Tax Assessment, Recovery and Management Rules, 2024 prescribes Form 21 for an inheritor, survivor, or successor after death.
Read this with itThe prescribed form does not prove a current public online submission flow, successor eligibility, document acceptance, or an issued mutation.
Rule 10 and Form 24 of the BBMP Property Tax Assessment, Recovery and Management Rules, 2024 state that an authorised officer may certify a mutation and issue an e-Khata order when no objection is received within the notice period.
Read this with itThis is a conditional rule, not an approval promise, service-level time, or property-specific outcome.
The current public e-Aasthi Pending Mutation Report lists inheritance as one of the displayed bases of mutation.
Read this with itA visible report label is not evidence that a successor's record exists, qualifies for automatic mutation, or can be completed online.
Section 149(2) of the published BBMP Act text states that a person receiving title as heir or otherwise after the death of the person primarily liable must give notice within one year from the death.
Read this with itStatutory timing only; it does not establish the current form or accepted successor evidence. The original official endpoint is currently unavailable; this claim is retained as incomplete historical/public evidence, not a current complete procedure.
The BBMP Revenue checklist publishes separate inheritance-with-will and inheritance-without-will branches, including prior title/possession evidence, current tax receipt, death evidence, family-tree/NOC material in stated cases, and an encumbrance certificate.
Read this with itThe checklist is scenario-specific and undated; do not generalise it to all succession cases. The original official endpoint is currently unavailable; this claim is retained as incomplete historical/public evidence, not a current complete procedure.
Rule 10 of the BBMP Property Tax Assessment, Recovery and Management Rules, 2024 permits mutation information from a Sub-Registrar Form 18 intimation, an authorised-officer or court order, or information supplied by an interested person.
Read this with itThis rule states intake bases; it does not identify which one a particular property or public portal route will accept.
Rule 10 and Form 23 of the BBMP Property Tax Assessment, Recovery and Management Rules, 2024 provide at least fifteen days for an objection to a published mutation entry, in writing or online.
Read this with itNo notice, objection, or property-specific response was observed.
Section 149(3) of the published BBMP Act text states that when a transfer comes to the Chief Commissioner's or authorised officer's knowledge through notice or otherwise, the transferee's name is to be entered in the property-tax register.
Read this with itDescribes the statutory register outcome, not a property-specific update. The original official endpoint is currently unavailable; this claim is retained as incomplete historical/public evidence, not a current complete procedure.
The BBMP Revenue FAQ says a title holder may apply in the prescribed form to the concerned Assistant Revenue Officer, should include proof of up-to-date property-tax payment for change of khatha, and describes a 2% transfer fee on the sale deed's stamp-duty value.
Read this with itThe filing/fee statements are direct official guidance but undated/legacy and not reconciled on-page with the 2024 rules or current e-Aasthi route. The original official endpoint is currently unavailable; this claim is retained as incomplete historical/public evidence, not a current complete procedure.
Rule 10 and Form 24 state that when no objection is received within the notice period, the authorised officer may certify the mutation and issue an e-Khata order recording the transferred name in property-tax records.
Read this with itConditional legal sequence, not an approval promise or service-level time. The original official endpoint is currently unavailable; this claim is retained as incomplete historical/public evidence, not a current complete procedure.
Rule 10 prescribes Form 21 for an inheritor, survivor, or successor after death, and Form 22 for a registered deed where the Sub-Registrar intimation slip has not reached BBMP; Form 22 calls for a certified copy of the registered deed.
Read this with itPrescribed legal forms; no current blank submission screen was inspected. The original official endpoint is currently unavailable; this claim is retained as incomplete historical/public evidence, not a current complete procedure.
Rule 10 of the 2024 BBMP property-tax rules provides mutation information from a Sub-Registrar Form 18 intimation slip, an authorised-officer or court order, or information supplied by an interested person, with the information recorded in the prescribed mutation registers.
Read this with itPublished rule routes; it does not establish which route a specific property will expose. The original official endpoint is currently unavailable; this claim is retained as incomplete historical/public evidence, not a current complete procedure.
Rule 10 and Form 23 provide for publication and individual notice concerning a mutation entry, with at least fifteen days to submit an objection in writing or online.
Read this with itPublished objection opportunity; no particular notice or objection was observed. The original official endpoint is currently unavailable; this claim is retained as incomplete historical/public evidence, not a current complete procedure.
Block two
Two kinds of thing sit here: questions the published record leaves open, and points where our own reading stopped — at a login we did not cross, or a step we could not observe without applying. Each item says which it is. Both are reasons to ask before you apply rather than after.
This bounded pass did not identify a sufficiently specific public first-person Bengaluru account of property-tax or e-Khata mutation after a recorded owner or occupier's death.
Where we stoppedOnly public first-person evidence was in scope. Official forms, general guides, court records, and non-Bengaluru accounts were excluded; the gap does not indicate success or failure of the successor route.
This pass did not establish a property-specific succession decision, record correction, missing-property response, payment reconciliation, name correction, mutation certification, or e-Khata order.
Where we stoppedNo login, OTP, property identifier, EC, form, objection, payment, or submission was used.
Block three
Failure points recorded for this situation, with the recovery the record supports — or the absence of one.
Published Act text and current BBMP index show different amendment dates.
Rules prescribe Forms 18-24 but no current property-specific submission screen was inspected.
A 15-day objection opportunity is published, but case-specific filing fields and review outcome are not.
Public rules and screens identify succession, search, EC, payment, and ARO handoffs but do not expose a property-specific decision or correction result without case data.
Citizen evidence in this pass does not substantiate a lived Bengaluru property-tax/e-Khata mutation after the recorded owner or occupier's death.
Take it with you
Both are built from the same claim records you just read. Neither one adds a fact that is not above.
Take this to the office
The questions this situation leaves open, each with the document and date that raised it, and a note of what you have already read. It contains no personal details — you fill those in yourself before sending.
Same record, different reader
The identical evidence shaped for an assistant: supported facts with their grades and dates, the unresolved questions kept unresolved, and an explicit instruction that it authorises nothing.
Check us
Read them yourself. If one has moved or changed since we checked it, that is worth knowing before you act.
Not your case?
How to read the gradesA — binding law, regulation, commission order or gazette notification. B — current official procedure, form, portal or agency page. C — official but indirect, incomplete, archived, undated or potentially outdated. Unknown — no usable source.
Independent research, not official advice. Public sources and known gaps are shown together; do not submit personal data through this ledger. Evidence collected as of 2026-08-31; nothing on this page is generated when you open it. Every statement is a recorded claim you can trace to the source above, and the unsettled items stay unsettled on purpose.