Before you apply Marriage registration
Marriage registration · your situation
First-person reports whose statutory route is unknown; they are not evidence for either HMA or SMA.
Your next step
For this situation our research did not find an unresolved requirement. Read the evidence below, check the source dates against today, and confirm anything that looks out of date before you rely on it.
Responsible on the public record: Department of Stamps and Registration, Government of Karnataka, Kaveri 2.0, Department of Stamps and Registration, Department of Stamps and Registration, Government of Karnataka, Kaveri 2.0. We did not confirm that any of them decide this particular case.
Block one
Found in public documents, graded and dated. The statements closest to your situation come first; a single first-person account never outranks the documentary record. Open any source to read it yourself.
One citizen reported receiving a digitally signed marriage certificate through Kaveri after an online application.
Read this with itOne account only. It does not establish that online completion is available for a given SRO, legal route, document set, or case.
One Bengaluru Kaveri applicant explicitly described their case as not SMA and reported a submitted-online status after ten days despite e-signed witnesses.
Read this with itThe route is only distinguishable as non-SMA; it must not be relabelled as HMA. One reported status and duration do not establish a delay, service standard, or required next action.
One Bengaluru applicant reported an initial rejection, resubmission after adding requested wedding evidence and a photo, then a certificate after payment.
Read this with itOne reported case progression; it does not establish a document checklist, review time, payment amount, eligibility, or whether a physical visit is ordinarily unnecessary.
One citizen reported repeated Kaveri objections and that an objection reset Aadhaar-based verification and e-sign steps for the couple and witnesses.
Read this with itThis is not evidence that objections are routine, that a reset occurs in every case, or that any alleged motive is true.
One applicant reported that Kaveri would not save witness details and displayed “Try again”; another citizen reported eventual success only after repeated retries and possible re-entry of details.
Read this with itTwo unverified statements in one public discussion. They do not prove a system defect, identify its cause, or show that retrying resolves another case.
Block two
Two kinds of thing sit here: questions the published record leaves open, and points where our own reading stopped — at a login we did not cross, or a step we could not observe without applying. Each item says which it is. Both are reasons to ask before you apply rather than after.
Our research did not record an unresolved requirement for this situation. That is not the same as the record being complete — check the source dates before you rely on anything here.
Block three
Failure points recorded for this situation, with the recovery the record supports — or the absence of one.
One citizen reported repeated objections and renewed Aadhaar verification/e-sign activity after an objection.
One applicant reported a “Try again” message while adding witness details and no saved entry.
One explicitly non-SMA applicant reported that the submitted-online status remained after ten days.
Take it with you
Both are built from the same claim records you just read. Neither one adds a fact that is not above.
Take this to the office
The questions this situation leaves open, each with the document and date that raised it, and a note of what you have already read. It contains no personal details — you fill those in yourself before sending.
Same record, different reader
The identical evidence shaped for an assistant: supported facts with their grades and dates, the unresolved questions kept unresolved, and an explicit instruction that it authorises nothing.
Check us
Read them yourself. If one has moved or changed since we checked it, that is worth knowing before you act.
Not your case?
How to read the gradesE — genuine public first-person evidence.
Independent research, not official advice. Public sources and known gaps are shown together; do not submit personal data through this ledger. Evidence collected as of 2026-08-31; nothing on this page is generated when you open it. Every statement is a recorded claim you can trace to the source above, and the unsettled items stay unsettled on purpose.