BLRPublic Service Dependency Atlas

Before you apply Building plan approval

Building plan approval · your situation

Smaller/Suvarna Paravanige lead

Publicly described architect-led zonal route for smaller layouts. The public evidence does not confirm this as an end-to-end current application sequence. The public evidence does not confirm this as an end-to-end current application sequence. The public evidence does not confirm this as an end-to-end current application sequence. The public evidence does not confirm this as an end-to-end current application sequence.

Jurisdiction
Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
Evidence as of
2026-08-31
Supported statements
29
Left unresolved
26
Full research
Atlas entry →

Your next step

Ask before you apply.

Our research left 26 requirements for this situation unresolved in the public record. Take the clarification below to the responsible office and get the current position in writing before you submit anything.

Responsible on the public record: Greater Bengaluru Authority / Bengaluru City Corporations Town Planning, Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike Building Plan Approval System. We did not confirm that any of them decide this particular case.

Block one

What the published record says

Found in public documents, graded and dated. The statements closest to your situation come first; a single first-person account never outranks the documentary record. Open any source to read it yourself.

29 statements

The current unauthenticated GBA BPAS entry displays five Bengaluru city-corporation choices, a username/password/CAPTCHA sign-in surface, Citizen Search and Owner Search labels, project/owner-mobile fields, and an e-Khata mandatory notice for Building Licence, Plinth Certificate and Occupancy Certificate applications from 1 July 2025.

Evidence BRecord verifiedBasis observation

Read this with itDirect public-page observation on 2026-08-31. No sign-in, CAPTCHA, identifier or search was used.

The current public FAQ publishes recovery routes for workflow problems: an architect may email the concerned Building License Department or IT helpdesk if the architect is not cooperating, and an architect with online-filing difficulty may use the helpdesk email/telephone/SMS/EODB support route; the public helpdesk also exposes knowledge-base browse/search and a New ticket form.

Evidence BRecord verifiedBasis observation

Read this with itThe FAQ's recovery wording is directed to an architect/LS. The public New ticket form visibly requests an email address and Project No.; no ticket or personal data was entered.

The public Suvarna Paravanige procedure PDF lists latest Khata certificate/extract, latest tax receipt, sale/title deed, encumbrance certificate, conversion or land-use documents where applicable, revenue sketch where applicable, detailed building plan and architect licence copy as documents to enclose.

Evidence BRecord verifiedBasis observation

Read this with itThe document describes enclosure leads and uses 'wherever applicable'; no file was selected or uploaded.

The public Suvarna Paravanige procedure PDF states a maximum service-delivery time of 10 working days.

Evidence BRecord verifiedBasis observation

Read this with itPublished document statement only; it does not establish a current case SLA or account for missing documents, inspection, risk category or portal changes.

The public Suvarna Paravanige procedure PDF describes zonal-office residential building-plan sanction for a site area up to 4,000 sq ft, up to four dwelling units and up to 15 m height, with online filing plus hard-copy records/drawings, scrutiny/processing charge, inspection, document/drawing verification, demand note, fee receipt and approval/rejection steps.

Evidence BRecord partialBasis observation

Read this with itThis is what the public procedure document states; it is not a property-specific eligibility decision and does not override current portal validation.

The public BPAS Citizen Search surface exposes project/proposal number, zone, ward, plot, CTS, applicant, architect/L.E./S.E. and View Application fields/columns.

Evidence BRecord verifiedBasis observation

Read this with itPublic controls were observed without entering an identifier; no application result or licence was retrieved.

The public BPAS/GBA entry page exposes username, password and CAPTCHA sign-in fields for the permit system; this public-only pass stops before authenticated project creation or submission.

Evidence BRecord verifiedBasis observation

Read this with itNo credentials, CAPTCHA, or authentication attempt was made.

The public BPAS/GBA entry page describes a single-window clearance system for Greater Bengaluru Authority construction permits and says certificates are online digitally signed certificates.

Evidence BRecord verifiedBasis observation

Read this with itCurrent public page observation; it does not prove that every permit category or certificate is available without an authenticated professional/applicant session.

Show the remaining 21 statements

The current BPAS FAQ lists eight construction-permit steps: online CAF, online sanction including required external NOCs, payment and release of the sanctioned plan, plinth-level commencement application, commencement certificate, occupancy CAF, BBMP/NOC-agency inspection, and applicable compounding-fee/charge intimation with occupancy-certificate release.

Evidence BRecord verifiedBasis observation

Read this with itPublished sequence includes later CC/OC stages; this pass concerns plan approval and did not proceed into a live case.

The public BPAS/GBA entry page states that e-Khata is mandatory for Building Licence, Plinth Certificate and Occupancy Certificate applications from 1 July 2025.

Evidence BRecord verifiedBasis observation

Read this with itCurrent portal message observed 2026-08-31. It does not show how e-Khata is validated or whether exceptions exist.

The public BPAS fee calculator exposes service, use, built-up-area, building-type, dwelling-unit, locality and category inputs and budget-head estimates including scrutiny fee, ground rent, KTCP/betterment, security deposit, road-cutting, labour cess and licence fee.

Evidence BRecord verifiedBasis observation

Read this with itCurrent blank calculator surface only; no amount is asserted for an individual proposal.

The current BPAS FAQ says NOC requirements depend on plot size, location, building type and height, and gives examples including aviation/fire/BESCOM for buildings at least 15 m, KSPCB/BWSSB for larger built-up area or 20-plus dwelling-unit residential proposals, SEIAA above 20,000 sq m, and BMRCL when a site abuts a proposed metro line.

Evidence BRecord verifiedBasis observation

Read this with itThe thresholds and agency examples are transcribed from the current FAQ; no property facts were supplied to select an NOC.

The current BPAS FAQ says a building-permission applicant applies online with requisite documents and PreDCR drawings through empanelled professionals on the BBMP portal.

Evidence BRecord verifiedBasis observation

Read this with itThe FAQ states the professional-led route; no professional was selected and no application was created.

The public BPAS Plan Sanction checklist contains fields for applicant/site, BDA layout, plot-area comparisons, RMP-2015 land use, conversion and revenue records, Khata and tax receipt, prior sanction, Metro NOC, NOC details, inspection date, road width, site features, FAR/plinth/built-up area, floors/height, buffers and zoning-regulation comparisons.

Evidence BRecord verifiedBasis observation

Read this with itDirect checklist observation; the PDF does not establish that every listed field applies to every proposal.

The current BPAS downloads page publicly lists a Plan Approval manual, Plan Sanction checklist, Schedule-II prescribed application, Schedule-III supervision form, professional/owner affidavits, bonds and Nambike Nakshe/Single Plot Approval forms.

Evidence BRecord verifiedBasis observation

Read this with itThe page lists public downloads; individual form eligibility and current submission behavior remain unverified.

The public BPAS contact page lists Building Licence Cell leadership and zonal Assistant Director contacts for South, East, Dasarahalli, Rajarajeshwari Nagara and Mahadevapura.

Evidence BRecord verifiedBasis observation

Read this with itContact listing only; it does not identify the correct authority for an unknown property or establish response time.

The BPAS sequence names pre-DCR CAD plan, applicable NOCs, sale deed and Khata certificate as upload examples before scrutiny; exact documents depend on the proposal.

Evidence CRecord partialBasis observation

Read this with itNo drawings or documents selected/uploaded. The original official endpoint is currently unavailable; this claim is retained as incomplete historical/public evidence, not a current complete procedure.

The dated BPAS workflow says licence fee is calculated by built-up area and that approval produces an online PDF licence; larger general proposals add chief engineer/joint commissioner stages.

Evidence CRecord partialBasis observation

Read this with itNo fee, payment, authority decision or PDF output exists. The original official endpoint is currently unavailable; this claim is retained as incomplete historical/public evidence, not a current complete procedure.

The official public submission page exposes a BPAS login link, so this public-only pass stops before architect/applicant session entry.

Evidence CRecord partialBasis observation

Read this with itNo credentials or login attempted. The original official endpoint is currently unavailable; this claim is retained as incomplete historical/public evidence, not a current complete procedure.

The BPAS public description routes online application/file creation through a BBMP-registered architect and identifies the architect/applicant as the external user.

Evidence CRecord partialBasis observation

Read this with itDated description; current GBA professional route unknown. The original official endpoint is currently unavailable; this claim is retained as incomplete historical/public evidence, not a current complete procedure.

The dated BPAS workflow describes inward document checking, automated DCR scrutiny, return/correction for gaps, then AE/ADTP site inspection when documents are correct.

Evidence CRecord partialBasis observation

Read this with itNo scrutiny, return or inspection observed. The original official endpoint is currently unavailable; this claim is retained as incomplete historical/public evidence, not a current complete procedure.

The official BPAS Plan Approval Manual describes an authenticated architect workflow with project creation, applicant/consultant and plot/building details, document attachment, geolocation, application-type selection, drawing upload and AutoDCR scrutiny, NOC/document attachment, challan and final submission.

Evidence CRecord partialBasis observation

Read this with itThe manual revision history ends 27-08-2020. It is retained as dated official guidance, not proof of current authenticated UI or sequence.

The official site-inspection procedure document states inspection schedules of within 7 days for head-office plan sanction and within 3 days for zonal-office plan sanction, with inspection-report publication within 48 hours and 24 hours respectively.

Evidence CRecord partialBasis observation

Read this with itOlder official procedure; no current inspection appointment or report was observed.

The same prospective buyer reported that the builder said the apartment had a BBMP-sanctioned plan and that the mapping result was incorrect.

Evidence ERecord partialBasis observation

Read this with itThis records a reported builder representation, not proof of a sanction, its validity, the map's inaccuracy, or legality. It is cross-linked because the source presents it as inconsistent with the reported mapping signal.

One citizen reported that, despite a BBMP-sanctioned plan, an electricity provider requested an affidavit concerning a completion-certificate-related condition for connection, including temporary connection.

Evidence ERecord partialBasis observation

Read this with itOne unverified account of a cross-system dependency; it does not establish a current provider policy, a certificate requirement, an exemption, or whether the reported account was complete.

One citizen reported that their building-plan approval had taken almost one month.

Evidence ERecord partialBasis observation

Read this with itOne unverified citizen-reported duration; it is not evidence of a service standard breach, a system-wide delay, or a cause.

One prospective buyer reported that a public mapping application displayed a watercourse signal at a shortlisted apartment site.

Evidence ERecord partialBasis observation

Read this with itThis preserves a reported interface signal only. It does not establish the map's accuracy, a restriction, or the site's legal status.

One citizen reported that a residential building-plan application appeared stuck after submission.

Evidence ERecord partialBasis observation

Read this with itOne applicant's reported status, not proof of a systemwide slowdown, a statutory delay, or the cause of the case state.

One citizen reported being told that how a road adjacent to a commercial proposal was treated could affect the apparent floor and parking options, alongside an alleged unofficial payment demand.

Evidence ERecord partialBasis observation

Read this with itA single unverified account. It is not evidence of a rule, entitlement, approved design, official charge, or misconduct determination.

Block two

Where the record disagrees with itself

Accounts we could not reconcile. We kept both rather than picking a winner.

3 contested

The current public FAQ's building-permit Do's section instructs applicants to make all payments online through net banking or debit/credit card.

Evidence BRecord contestedBasis observation

Read this with itRetained with the separate FAQ payment-mode statement; this pass does not resolve which instruction applies to a current case. Public FAQ statements are retained as unreconciled guidance; no payment method was attempted. Public FAQ statements are retained as unreconciled guidance; no payment method was attempted. Public FAQ statements are retained as unreconciled guidance; no payment method was attempted. Public FAQ statements are retained as unreconciled guidance; no payment method was attempted.

The current public FAQ says scrutiny fee is paid online with the application and other fees are charged through demand notes at construction stages, while another FAQ answer lists cash/cheque/DD at a CFC alongside online payment; the published fee-mode instructions are therefore internally conflicting.

Evidence UnknownRecord contestedBasis inference

Read this with itThe two statements appear in different FAQ sections on the same current page. No payment method was selected or used. Public FAQ statements are retained as unreconciled guidance; no payment method was attempted. Public FAQ statements are retained as unreconciled guidance; no payment method was attempted. This broad statement is retained only as an unresolved lead after the source-specific citation cap. Public FAQ statements are retained as unreconciled guidance; no payment method was attempted. This broad statement is retained only as an unresolved lead after the source-specific citation cap. Public FAQ statements are retained as unreconciled guidance; no payment method was attempted.

The current BPAS FAQ says applicable charges are deposited through online modes such as RTGS, NEFT or net banking and that cash, cheque and demand draft are not accepted.

Evidence BRecord contestedBasis observation

Read this with itThis current FAQ statement is recorded separately from older workflow documents that mention demand drafts; no payment method was tested. Public FAQ statements are retained as unreconciled guidance; no payment method was attempted. Public FAQ statements are retained as unreconciled guidance; no payment method was attempted. Public FAQ statements are retained as unreconciled guidance; no payment method was attempted. Public FAQ statements are retained as unreconciled guidance; no payment method was attempted.

Block three

What is still unsettled

Two kinds of thing sit here: questions the published record leaves open, and points where our own reading stopped — at a login we did not cross, or a step we could not observe without applying. Each item says which it is. Both are reasons to ask before you apply rather than after.

23 open

The current public FAQ lists plans/drawings, ownership documents, Khata extract or certificate and current tax receipt, plus digitally signed professional/safety declarations, and says NOCs depend on plot size, location, building type and height.

The record leaves this openEvidence UnknownRecord unknownBasis inference

What we checkedThe page supplies examples and a dependency table, not a property-specific checklist. No document, drawing or NOC was uploaded. This broad statement is retained only as an unresolved lead after the source-specific citation cap. This broad statement is retained only as an unresolved lead after the source-specific citation cap.

The public-only pass does not establish the current property-specific corporation/route, required document or NOC set, scrutiny result, rejection text, inspection result, fee demand, payment acceptance, sanction decision or certificate output for any Bengaluru building-plan case; these are Unknown.

The record leaves this openEvidence UnknownRecord unknownBasis inference

What we checkedNo login, property facts, professional selection, document/drawing upload, NOC request, live search, payment or submission was made.

The current public FAQ says an applicant obtains building permission online with requisite documents and PreDCR drawings through an empanelled professional, and that the architect completes a Common Application Form containing plot and professional details.

The record leaves this openEvidence UnknownRecord unknownBasis inference

What we checkedThe FAQ wording is recorded as published guidance; no professional was selected and no CAF was opened or completed. This broad statement is retained only as an unresolved lead after the source-specific citation cap. This broad statement is retained only as an unresolved lead after the source-specific citation cap. This broad statement is retained only as an unresolved lead after the source-specific citation cap.

After the public GBA/BPAS entry's sign-in/CAPTCHA boundary, the current authenticated form sequence, validation messages, live submission handoff and case-specific recovery remain Unknown in this pass.

The record leaves this openEvidence UnknownRecord unknownBasis inference

What we checkedThe sign-in controls were observed, but no credentials or CAPTCHA were used and no access-control bypass was attempted.

The current public FAQ names incomplete mandatory uploads, non-conforming plans, missing applicable NOCs or landowner/access-right documents, invalid ownership documents, Auto-Scrutiny drawing deviations and missing retained-structure evidence as common application-rejection reasons.

The record leaves this openEvidence UnknownRecord unknownBasis inference

What we checkedThese are the FAQ's published common mistakes, not a rejection of a real case. This broad statement is retained only as an unresolved lead after the source-specific citation cap. This broad statement is retained only as an unresolved lead after the source-specific citation cap.

The current public FAQ publishes building-permit stages including Concession, Concession order, IOD, First CC, Further CC, BCC and OCC, and says a citizen-search route can use file number, applicant, architect, zone, ward or plot/location fields to look up a file.

The record leaves this openEvidence UnknownRecord unknownBasis inference

What we checkedThe search fields and stage labels were read from public FAQ text only; no identifier or live case lookup was performed. This broad statement is retained only as an unresolved lead after the source-specific citation cap. This broad statement is retained only as an unresolved lead after the source-specific citation cap. This broad statement is retained only as an unresolved lead after the source-specific citation cap.

The BPAS description says building plan approval is administered through town planning across eight BBMP zones and that an owner/applicant files online through a BBMP-registered architect, who creates the file and uploads the plan/documents.

The record leaves this openEvidence UnknownRecord unknownBasis inference

What we checkedPublished 2019 IT description; current GBA/professional registration behavior is unknown. The original official endpoint is currently unavailable; this claim is retained as incomplete historical/public evidence, not a current complete procedure. This broad statement is retained only as an unresolved lead after the source-specific citation cap. This broad statement is retained only as an unresolved lead after the source-specific citation cap. This broad statement is retained only as an unresolved lead after the source-specific citation cap.

The BPAS description names a pre-DCR building plan in CAD format, applicable NOCs such as fire/water/pollution/environment, sale deed and Khata certificate as examples of uploads, with requirements depending on the proposal.

The record leaves this openEvidence UnknownRecord unknownBasis inference

What we checkedExamples are not a universal current checklist; no file was uploaded. The original official endpoint is currently unavailable; this claim is retained as incomplete historical/public evidence, not a current complete procedure. This broad statement is retained only as an unresolved lead after the source-specific citation cap. This broad statement is retained only as an unresolved lead after the source-specific citation cap. This broad statement is retained only as an unresolved lead after the source-specific citation cap.

The BPAS description says license fee is calculated by built-up area, further approval routes through ADTP and larger general proposals involve chief engineer/joint commissioner, after which an online PDF license is generated/sent.

The record leaves this openEvidence UnknownRecord unknownBasis inference

What we checkedFee amount, authority thresholds and current output timing are unknown. The original official endpoint is currently unavailable; this claim is retained as incomplete historical/public evidence, not a current complete procedure. This broad statement is retained only as an unresolved lead after the source-specific citation cap. This broad statement is retained only as an unresolved lead after the source-specific citation cap. This broad statement is retained only as an unresolved lead after the source-specific citation cap.

The BPAS description says the inward clerk checks documents, an assistant engineer/case worker performs automated DCR scrutiny, gaps may be returned for correction, and an assistant engineer with ADTP conducts site inspection when documents are correct.

The record leaves this openEvidence UnknownRecord unknownBasis inference

What we checkedDated workflow description; no scrutiny or inspection occurred. The original official endpoint is currently unavailable; this claim is retained as incomplete historical/public evidence, not a current complete procedure. This broad statement is retained only as an unresolved lead after the source-specific citation cap. This broad statement is retained only as an unresolved lead after the source-specific citation cap. This broad statement is retained only as an unresolved lead after the source-specific citation cap.

The atlas has not independently verified a claim-specific official text for the detailed Section 299 requirements previously summarised here.

The record leaves this openEvidence UnknownRecord unknownBasis inference

What we checkedThe retained India Code entry point is not a claim-specific reproduction of the statutory text.

The earlier route-label index cited in this atlas could not be independently reproduced from the current public BPAS FAQ.

The record leaves this openEvidence UnknownRecord unknownBasis inference

What we checkedThe prior route-label endpoint is unavailable. Sakala/manual/head-office labels and property applicability remain unverified.

Current corporation/zone, route category, professional registration, document/NOC checklist, fee, timings, inspection result and sanction/licence outcome remain Unknown.

The record leaves this openEvidence UnknownRecord unknownBasis inference

What we checkedNo architect login, property data, upload, payment or submission.

The current BPAS FAQ says the architect fills a Common Application Form with plot and professional details including owner, plot size, colony category, zone and consultant details, and that relevant information is transferred to external agencies for NOCs as required.

The record leaves this openEvidence UnknownRecord unknownBasis inference

What we checkedThis records the FAQ description, not the fields or NOC result for a particular case. This broad statement is retained only as an unresolved lead after the source-specific citation cap. This broad statement is retained only as an unresolved lead after the source-specific citation cap. This broad statement is retained only as an unresolved lead after the source-specific citation cap.

The current BPAS FAQ lists plans and drawings, ownership documents, Khata extract/certificate, up-to-date tax receipt, and digitally signed professional/safety/supervision/debris-removal/indemnity declarations as CAF document leads.

The record leaves this openEvidence UnknownRecord unknownBasis inference

What we checkedThe FAQ presents these as CAF document leads; exact requiredness remains proposal-specific. This broad statement is retained only as an unresolved lead after the source-specific citation cap.

The current BPAS FAQ says scrutiny fee is paid online with the application and other fees are paid against demand notes generated at plan-sanction, commencement-certificate and occupancy-certificate stages.

The record leaves this openEvidence UnknownRecord unknownBasis inference

What we checkedNo amount, demand note or payment was generated for a case. This broad statement is retained only as an unresolved lead after the source-specific citation cap. This broad statement is retained only as an unresolved lead after the source-specific citation cap. This broad statement is retained only as an unresolved lead after the source-specific citation cap.

The current BPAS FAQ publishes risk categories B1 through B5 using plot size, height and floors for residential and non-residential buildings, and gives separate head-office and zonal-office working-day totals for plan sanction and later certificates.

The record leaves this openEvidence UnknownRecord unknownBasis inference

What we checkedThe FAQ matrix is not used to classify an unknown property. The published totals range by risk and office; no sanction-time guarantee is inferred. This broad statement is retained only as an unresolved lead after the source-specific citation cap. This broad statement is retained only as an unresolved lead after the source-specific citation cap. This broad statement is retained only as an unresolved lead after the source-specific citation cap.

The current BPAS FAQ says applicants do not need separate applications for listed inter-departmental NOCs because the single-window system transmits the relevant information to concerned agencies; it also says online communication is used for inspection scheduling.

The record leaves this openEvidence UnknownRecord unknownBasis inference

What we checkedThe FAQ describes system routing; no NOC request or inspection event was initiated. This broad statement is retained only as an unresolved lead after the source-specific citation cap. This broad statement is retained only as an unresolved lead after the source-specific citation cap. This broad statement is retained only as an unresolved lead after the source-specific citation cap.

The current GBA public home lists Building Permission; BBMP's public citizen index lists approval jurisdiction, submission procedure, required documents, NOCs, fees, registered professionals, site inspection, Sakala and FAQ links.

The record leaves this openEvidence UnknownRecord unknownBasis inference

What we checkedDirectory labels only; no live target was opened. The original official endpoint is currently unavailable; this claim is retained as incomplete historical/public evidence, not a current complete procedure. This broad statement is retained only as an unresolved lead after the source-specific citation cap. This broad statement is retained only as an unresolved lead after the source-specific citation cap. This broad statement is retained only as an unresolved lead after the source-specific citation cap.

BBMP's public procedure page labels Sakala manual submission at sub-division office, Suvarna Paravanige and commencement/occupancy certificates at zonal office, and plan sanction at head office, alongside registered-professional links.

The record leaves this openEvidence UnknownRecord unknownBasis inference

What we checkedPublic labels do not prove current eligibility or office routing for a supplied property. The original official endpoint is currently unavailable; this claim is retained as incomplete historical/public evidence, not a current complete procedure. This broad statement is retained only as an unresolved lead after the source-specific citation cap. This broad statement is retained only as an unresolved lead after the source-specific citation cap. This broad statement is retained only as an unresolved lead after the source-specific citation cap.

No reviewed official public source establishes a supplied property's approval jurisdiction, current building category/threshold, professional requirement, current document/NOC checklist, fee, sanction timing, inspection result or issued plan licence.

The record leaves this openEvidence UnknownRecord unknownBasis inference

What we checkedNo architect login, property data, upload, payment, plan submission or case lookup.

The citizen accounts do not establish the competent authority, applicable rules, required professional, document set, scrutiny outcome, fee, inspection, licence, or timeline for a particular Bengaluru building-plan case.

The record leaves this openEvidence UnknownRecord unknownBasis inference

What we checkedNo application, upload, payment, inspection request, or case lookup was performed.

No reviewed official public source establishes the correct route, current professional requirement, applicable document/NOC set, fee demand, scrutiny remark, inspection result, sanction decision or issued licence for a particular Bengaluru property without property and authenticated application data.

The record leaves this openEvidence UnknownRecord unknownBasis inference

What we checkedPublic pages and documents were reviewed, but no login, property identifier, upload, payment, submission or case lookup was performed.

Block four

Where this route is known to break

Failure points recorded for this situation, with the recovery the record supports — or the absence of one.

14 recorded
documentation

Zone/category and GBA transition

Public pages list multiple routes (Sakala, Suvarna Paravanige, general/head office) while current GBA corporation/zone mapping is not shown.

Likely cause
Property location, proposal size/height/use and city-corporation transition.
Recovery
Confirm current zone, category and competent authority before appointing/submitting through a professional.
Owner on the public record
Greater Bengaluru Authority / Bengaluru City Corporations Town Planning, Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike Building Plan Approval System
documentation

Case-specific plans/NOCs/fees

Published examples do not establish the current checklist, NOC set, fee or professional registration for a supplied property.

Likely cause
Land use, proposal size/height, zoning, construction type and external clearances drive requirements.
Recovery
Get the current category checklist and fee from Town Planning/registered professional; no upload or payment in this pass.
Owner on the public record
Greater Bengaluru Authority / Bengaluru City Corporations Town Planning, Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike Building Plan Approval System
documentation

Scrutiny, inspection and sanction unobserved

No project number, scrutiny remark, inspection, demand, payment or licence exists.

Likely cause
These states require a real architect-led application and municipal processing.
Recovery
Retain project/reference number after an authorised filing; displayed/dated workflows are not approval guarantees.
Owner on the public record
Greater Bengaluru Authority / Bengaluru City Corporations Town Planning, Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike Building Plan Approval System
documentation

Route/category and current GBA mapping

Multiple public route labels and a login-gated legacy BPAS path leave current category/zone routing unknown.

Likely cause
Property facts and GBA/city-corporation transition are not supplied.
Recovery
Confirm current zone, route and competent authority before architect-led action.
Owner on the public record
Greater Bengaluru Authority / Bengaluru City Corporations Town Planning, Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike Building Plan Approval System
documentation

Documents, fee and output unobserved

No drawing, NOC, scrutiny result, inspection, demand, payment or licence exists.

Likely cause
These states require a real architect/applicant submission and municipal processing.
Recovery
Use current GBA/Town Planning and registered-professional guidance after authorisation; dated BPAS sequence is not a guarantee.
Owner on the public record
Greater Bengaluru Authority / Bengaluru City Corporations Town Planning, Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike Building Plan Approval System
process

Reported plan application appears pending without a verified cause

A citizen reports a submitted residential plan appearing stuck.

Likely cause
Unknown; the account cannot distinguish jurisdiction, completeness, scrutiny, objection, workflow, or case-specific conditions.
Recovery
Obtain an authorised case-specific status and written reason through the relevant authority's current route. Do not infer a general approval halt from this account.
documentation

Reported uncertainty about proposal treatment and road classification

A citizen reports conflicting practical expectations around road treatment, floor count and parking for a commercial proposal.

Likely cause
Unknown; the report does not validate road status, applicable rules, proposal details, authority or advice received.
Recovery
Seek written, authorised clarification from the competent planning authority or a properly qualified professional. Do not use or pay an unofficial route based on this account.
process

Authenticated case path not publicly verified

The current public entry shows sign-in/CAPTCHA controls, while the live authenticated form, validation and submission result were not observable.

Likely cause
Architect/owner account access and case-specific property/application state are required for the next workflow states.
Recovery
Use the public FAQ and published architect/helpdesk routes; retain the authenticated form and case outcome as Unknown until an authorised user proceeds.
Owner on the public record
Greater Bengaluru Authority / Bengaluru City Corporations Town Planning, Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike Building Plan Approval System
documentation

Document/NOC and scrutiny failure signals

The FAQ lists missing or non-conforming plans, ownership/access records, NOCs and Auto-Scrutiny deviations as common rejection reasons.

Likely cause
The proposal-specific document, drawing and NOC package does not meet the applicable requirements.
Recovery
Use the published mistake list to correct the package with the authorised professional; no correction or resubmission was performed.
Owner on the public record
Greater Bengaluru Authority / Bengaluru City Corporations Town Planning
process

Published fee-mode instructions conflict

One current FAQ section says all payments are online, while another lists CFC cash/cheque/DD alongside online payment.

Likely cause
Different FAQ sections or legacy guidance have not been reconciled on the public page.
Recovery
Obtain current authorised clarification through the published architect/helpdesk route before paying; no payment was attempted.
Owner on the public record
Greater Bengaluru Authority / Bengaluru City Corporations Town Planning, Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike Building Plan Approval System
process

No case-specific approval outcome

No live project, status result, scrutiny remark, fee demand, payment, inspection, sanction, licence, CC, BCC or OC exists in this public-only pass.

Likely cause
Those states require an authorised route, case data and/or an actual municipal application.
Recovery
Use a case-specific authorised search or filing and retain the project/reference number; do not treat FAQ stages as a live approval.
Owner on the public record
Greater Bengaluru Authority / Bengaluru City Corporations Town Planning
process

Reported approval delay without a verifiable case state

One citizen reported that a building-plan approval had taken almost one month.

Likely cause
Unknown; the account does not reveal the authority, submission date, completeness, scrutiny state, objection, or case-specific dependency.
Recovery
Use the competent authority's current, authorised case-status and written-reason route; do not infer a general delay or cause from this account.
documentation

Unverified due-diligence lead about map and sanction representations

A prospective buyer reported a public mapping signal that appeared inconsistent with a builder's statement about an approved plan.

Likely cause
Unknown; neither the map record nor the claimed sanction was verified, and the account does not establish how either source should be interpreted for the property.
Recovery
Obtain authoritative, property-specific records from the responsible agencies and qualified independent review before relying on either representation.
infrastructure

Reported utility-connection obstacle after plan sanction

One citizen reported a claimed affidavit and certificate-related condition for electricity connection after plan sanction.

Likely cause
Unknown; the citizen account cannot verify the provider's current rule, property category, application completeness, certificate status, or whether the reported condition applied.
Recovery
Request the current written requirement and case-specific explanation from the relevant provider and planning authority; do not rely on forum advice or an informal intermediary.

Take it with you

Two ways to carry this

Both are built from the same claim records you just read. Neither one adds a fact that is not above.

Take this to the office

Prepare my clarification

The questions this situation leaves open, each with the document and date that raised it, and a note of what you have already read. It contains no personal details — you fill those in yourself before sending.

Same record, different reader

Copy for my agent

The identical evidence shaped for an assistant: supported facts with their grades and dates, the unresolved questions kept unresolved, and an explicit instruction that it authorises nothing.

Check us

Every source behind this brief

Read them yourself. If one has moved or changed since we checked it, that is worth knowing before you act.

18 sources

Not your case?

Other situations for this service

Larger/general proposal leadManual/Sakala route lead

How to read the gradesB — current official procedure, form, portal or agency page. C — official but indirect, incomplete, archived, undated or potentially outdated. E — genuine public first-person evidence. Unknown — no usable source.

Independent research, not official advice. Public sources and known gaps are shown together; do not submit personal data through this ledger. Evidence collected as of 2026-08-31; nothing on this page is generated when you open it. Every statement is a recorded claim you can trace to the source above, and the unsettled items stay unsettled on purpose.