Bengaluru · Independent public-source guide

Your building plan approval journey

Independent research snapshot · checked 2026-08-31 · Map status: Partially mapped · 0 of 3 routes fully researched

Follow the published route for building plan approval, the places it can stall, and the questions the available public record does not answer.

Key terms
BPAS
Building Plan Approval System, the public entry for plan-permission work.
DCR
Development Control Regulations used when a plan is checked against planning rules.
NOC
No Objection Certificate from another authority when a proposal requires one.
Sakala
Karnataka’s time-bound public-service framework, named as one submission route.
Registered architect
The licensed professional identified in the published application route.
How this usually works

Building plan approval is permission to build or alter a property under the responsible planning authority. Public material starts with confirming the authority and route, then points to an architect-led or manual route, plans and documents, scrutiny, inspection, fees and a sanction or licence result. No project-specific route or approval was tested.

Find my path

The atlas’s central finding

What nobody has documented

These are unresolved steps and problems that can leave a citizen stuck because no usable public procedure was found. Routine empty fields and internal research notes are not counted.

  1. A citizen reports a submitted residential plan appearing stuck.The underlying cause is not documented. The listed next step is a cautious workaround, not a published resolution.
  2. You are waiting for plan sanction/licence output, but there is no public way to confirm what happens next.The decision rules, responsible team, and reliable recovery route are not fully published.
  3. You are trying to follow sakala/manual route, but the public guidance stops before a case-specific outcome.The current route, responsible office, and recovery path are not fully published.
  4. Your application is awaiting site inspection and authority review, but you cannot see who owns the review or how to resolve a return.The review criteria, responsible official, and correction route are not fully published.
  5. A citizen reports conflicting practical expectations around road treatment, floor count and parking for a commercial proposal.The underlying cause is not documented. The listed next step is a cautious workaround, not a published resolution.
Show all 10 gaps
  1. A prospective buyer reported a public mapping signal that appeared inconsistent with a builder's statement about an approved plan.The underlying cause is not documented. The listed next step is a cautious workaround, not a published resolution.
  2. One citizen reported a claimed affidavit and certificate-related condition for electricity connection after plan sanction.The underlying cause is not documented. The listed next step is a cautious workaround, not a published resolution.
  3. One citizen reported that a building-plan approval had taken almost one month.The underlying cause is not documented. The listed next step is a cautious workaround, not a published resolution.
  4. The current public entry shows sign-in/CAPTCHA controls, while the live authenticated form, validation and submission result were not observable.The public material does not say who owns the fix, what evidence resolves it, or how long resolution takes.
  5. You are preparing plans, documents and NOCs, but cannot tell what will be accepted.The current checklist, validation rules, and route for rejected files are not fully published.
How to read this pageA status tells you how much of a step is publicly supported. A letter tells you what kind of source supports it.
verifiedSupported by evidence at the stated grade
partialSome of this record is supported; important gaps remain
contestedSources or observed states disagree
unknownNo usable source yet; do not infer the answer
ABinding ruleBCurrent official sourceCOfficial but incomplete or olderDAttributable secondary sourceECitizen evidenceFUncorroborated leadUnknownNo usable source

01 · Start here

Which of these is you?

Choose the closest match. Everything below updates for the path you pick.

Smaller/Suvarna Paravanige lead · 7 of 8 records researched · 7 steps have no public procedure

02 · Trace the records

The records that need to line up for your building plan approval

Choose a record to see what it must show, how you can check it, what can go wrong, and which public sources support the explanation.

needs
needs
needs
needs
needs
needs
leads to

You’re looking at: Public permission entry — a service step held by GBA / City Corporation Town Planning

Public permission entry

Record current GBA Building Permission label and BBMP public submission/login boundary.

What this must say before your next step can work

No live target or session exists.

Check

How can I check it?

Login boundary
verified

Public submission page exposes login link; no login used.

Open linked check ↗
COfficial but incomplete or olderpartial

The official public submission page exposes a BPAS login link, so this public-only pass stops before architect/applicant session entry.

Read directly in a sourceBengaluru, Karnataka, India

No credentials or login attempted. The original official endpoint is currently unavailable; this claim is retained as incomplete historical/public evidence, not a current complete procedure.

Entry controls and public searches
verified

Observe city-corporation choices, sign-in/CAPTCHA controls, Citizen Search/Owner Search labels and the e-Khata notice without entering data.

Open linked check ↗
BCurrent official sourceverified

The current unauthenticated GBA BPAS entry displays five Bengaluru city-corporation choices, a username/password/CAPTCHA sign-in surface, Citizen Search and Owner Search labels, project/owner-mobile fields, and an e-Khata mandatory notice for Building Licence, Plinth Certificate and Occupancy Certificate applications from 1 July 2025.

Read directly in a sourceBengaluru, Karnataka, India

Direct public-page observation on 2026-08-31. No sign-in, CAPTCHA, identifier or search was used.

Failure

What does failure look like?

Sign-in/CAPTCHA boundary
partial

The entry exposes username, password and CAPTCHA controls; no public-only pass can verify what follows authenticated entry.

Open linked check ↗
BCurrent official sourceverified

The current unauthenticated GBA BPAS entry displays five Bengaluru city-corporation choices, a username/password/CAPTCHA sign-in surface, Citizen Search and Owner Search labels, project/owner-mobile fields, and an e-Khata mandatory notice for Building Licence, Plinth Certificate and Occupancy Certificate applications from 1 July 2025.

Read directly in a sourceBengaluru, Karnataka, India

Direct public-page observation on 2026-08-31. No sign-in, CAPTCHA, identifier or search was used.

UnknownNo usable sourceunknown

After the public GBA/BPAS entry's sign-in/CAPTCHA boundary, the current authenticated form sequence, validation messages, live submission next step and case-specific recovery remain Unknown in this pass.

Interpretation from sourcesBengaluru, Karnataka, India

The sign-in controls were observed, but no credentials or CAPTCHA were used and no access-control bypass was attempted.

No source is linked to this statement. It is explicitly marked Unknown.
Recovery

What can I do next?

Forgot Password link
partial

The public entry visibly exposes a Forgot Password link for an existing account; no account or reset was used.

Open linked check ↗
BCurrent official sourceverified

The current unauthenticated GBA BPAS entry displays five Bengaluru city-corporation choices, a username/password/CAPTCHA sign-in surface, Citizen Search and Owner Search labels, project/owner-mobile fields, and an e-Khata mandatory notice for Building Licence, Plinth Certificate and Occupancy Certificate applications from 1 July 2025.

Read directly in a sourceBengaluru, Karnataka, India

Direct public-page observation on 2026-08-31. No sign-in, CAPTCHA, identifier or search was used.

Where this comes from

Every statement above, with its source and how strong that source is

Show the sources for this record
COfficial but incomplete or olderpartial

The official public submission page exposes a BPAS login link, so this public-only pass stops before architect/applicant session entry.

Read directly in a sourceBengaluru, Karnataka, India

No credentials or login attempted. The original official endpoint is currently unavailable; this claim is retained as incomplete historical/public evidence, not a current complete procedure.

BCurrent official sourceverified

The public BPAS/GBA entry page describes a single-window clearance system for Greater Bengaluru Authority construction permits and says certificates are online digitally signed certificates.

Read directly in a sourceBengaluru, Karnataka, India

Current public page observation; it does not prove that every permit category or certificate is available without an authenticated professional/applicant session.

BCurrent official sourceverified

The current BPAS FAQ says a building-permission applicant applies online with requisite documents and PreDCR drawings through empanelled professionals on the BBMP portal.

Read directly in a sourceBengaluru, Karnataka, India

The FAQ states the professional-led route; no professional was selected and no application was created.

BCurrent official sourceverified

The public BPAS Citizen Search surface exposes project/proposal number, zone, ward, plot, CTS, applicant, architect/L.E./S.E. and View Application fields/columns.

Read directly in a sourceBengaluru, Karnataka, India

Public controls were observed without entering an identifier; no application result or licence was retrieved.

BCurrent official sourceverified

The current unauthenticated GBA BPAS entry displays five Bengaluru city-corporation choices, a username/password/CAPTCHA sign-in surface, Citizen Search and Owner Search labels, project/owner-mobile fields, and an e-Khata mandatory notice for Building Licence, Plinth Certificate and Occupancy Certificate applications from 1 July 2025.

Read directly in a sourceBengaluru, Karnataka, India

Direct public-page observation on 2026-08-31. No sign-in, CAPTCHA, identifier or search was used.

UnknownNo usable sourceunknown

After the public GBA/BPAS entry's sign-in/CAPTCHA boundary, the current authenticated form sequence, validation messages, live submission next step and case-specific recovery remain Unknown in this pass.

Interpretation from sourcesBengaluru, Karnataka, India

The sign-in controls were observed, but no credentials or CAPTCHA were used and no access-control bypass was attempted.

No source is linked to this statement. It is explicitly marked Unknown.

How one step leads to the next

What has to happen before the next step

These links show how the available sources connect the records for this situation. A dashed card means the link comes from citizen reports or has no published official procedure.

needspartial
Public permission entryChoose route conceptually

Public entry precedes conceptual route choice; login boundary stops further interaction.

COfficial but incomplete or olderUnknownNo usable source
needspartial
Choose route conceptuallyRegistered architect lead

Online BPAS route is described as architect-led after route/category selection.

COfficial but incomplete or older
needsunknown
Registered architect leadPlan/document/NOC stage

Registered architect creates file and uploads plan/documents in dated BPAS description.

No official procedure found in the public sources checked.
COfficial but incomplete or older
needsunknown
Plan/document/NOC stageDCR/document scrutiny

Plan/document package precedes scrutiny; no upload occurred.

No official procedure found in the public sources checked.
COfficial but incomplete or older
needsunknown
DCR/document scrutinySite inspection

Inspection follows document correctness in published sequence.

No official procedure found in the public sources checked.
COfficial but incomplete or older
needsunknown
Site inspectionFee and authority review

Inspection and fee stages are both described, but their current order is not publicly confirmed

No official procedure found in the public sources checked.
No source record linked yet
leads tounknown
Fee and authority reviewLicence/sanction output

Authority approval and fee/payment would precede licence output; no case exists.

No official procedure found in the public sources checked.
COfficial but incomplete or olderUnknownNo usable source

03 · The steps, as far as the evidence goes

Building permission public route boundary

unknown

A public-interface evidence map, not a confirmed end-to-end building-permission application route.

  1. 01
    Public permission entry

    Record public entry

    Read GBA Building Permission label and BBMP submission page login boundary.

    Expected resultPublic entry lead; no session.
    partial
  2. 02
    Choose route conceptually

    Compare route labels

    Read Sakala/Suvarna/general/head-office labels without selecting property data.

    Expected resultRoute leads recorded; property-specific route unknown.
    partial
  3. 03
    Plan/document/NOC stage

    Review plan/document stage

    Read BPAS examples without logging in or uploading files.

    Expected resultDocument classes recorded as leads; current checklist unknown.
    partial
  4. 04
    Licence/sanction output

    Preserve scrutiny/licence boundary

    Do not log in, submit, pay or upload; leave scrutiny, inspection, fee and licence outcome Unknown.

    Expected resultNo project, demand, inspection, approval or PDF licence.
    unknown
Where one step passes into another
Choose route conceptuallyRegistered architect leadunknown

Route/category facts determine whether architect-led BPAS path applies.

Recovery notes
  • No architect login, property data, upload, NOC, payment or submission was made.
  • Confirm current GBA route and category before relying on dated BBMP BPAS documentation.
What the public instructions leave unclear
  • GBA home is current directory; detailed BBMP BPAS/procedure materials are older.
  • Current zone/category checklist and sanction outcome remain unknown.
  • Current authenticated form sequence, validation, next steps and case outcomes were not observed.
  • Historic route labels could not be independently reproduced from a current procedure index.
  • Inspection-to-fee ordering and payment guidance remain unresolved in public material.
  • Citizen reports are leads only; they do not establish delays, legal status, sanction validity or utility requirements.
  • Several broad source observations remain compound in the ledger and are retained as stated limitations pending a future atomisation pass.

04 · What goes wrong, and why

Problems found in the public route

14 researched problems are linked to this path. Conflicting accounts stay visible so a generic error can be traced back to the record that may be causing it.

R01
documentationunknown

Zone/category and GBA transition

Public pages list multiple routes (Sakala, Suvarna Paravanige, general/head office) while current GBA corporation/zone mapping is not shown.

Likely cause
Property location, proposal size/height/use and city-corporation transition.
What you can try next
Confirm current zone, category and competent authority before appointing/submitting through a professional.
See evidence
UnknownNo usable sourceunknown

The current GBA public home lists Building Permission; BBMP's public citizen index lists approval jurisdiction, submission procedure, required documents, NOCs, fees, registered professionals, site inspection, Sakala and FAQ links.

Interpretation from sourcesBengaluru, Karnataka, India

Directory labels only; no live target was opened. The original official endpoint is currently unavailable; this claim is retained as incomplete historical/public evidence, not a current complete procedure. This broad statement is retained only as an unresolved lead after the source-specific citation cap. This broad statement is retained only as an unresolved lead after the source-specific citation cap. This broad statement is retained only as an unresolved lead after the source-specific citation cap.

No source is linked to this statement. It is explicitly marked Unknown.
UnknownNo usable sourceunknown

BBMP's public procedure page labels Sakala manual submission at sub-division office, Suvarna Paravanige and commencement/occupancy certificates at zonal office, and plan sanction at head office, alongside registered-professional links.

Interpretation from sourcesBengaluru, Karnataka, India

Public labels do not prove current eligibility or office routing for a supplied property. The original official endpoint is currently unavailable; this claim is retained as incomplete historical/public evidence, not a current complete procedure. This broad statement is retained only as an unresolved lead after the source-specific citation cap. This broad statement is retained only as an unresolved lead after the source-specific citation cap. This broad statement is retained only as an unresolved lead after the source-specific citation cap.

No source is linked to this statement. It is explicitly marked Unknown.
UnknownNo usable sourceunknown

No reviewed official public source establishes a supplied property's approval jurisdiction, current building category/threshold, professional requirement, current document/NOC checklist, fee, sanction timing, inspection result or issued plan licence.

Interpretation from sourcesBengaluru, Karnataka, India

No architect login, property data, upload, payment, plan submission or case lookup.

No source is linked to this statement. It is explicitly marked Unknown.
R02
documentationunknown

Case-specific plans/NOCs/fees

Published examples do not establish the current checklist, NOC set, fee or professional registration for a supplied property.

Likely cause
Land use, proposal size/height, zoning, construction type and external clearances drive requirements.
What you can try next
Get the current category checklist and fee from Town Planning/registered professional; no upload or payment in this pass.
See evidence
UnknownNo usable sourceunknown

The BPAS description names a pre-DCR building plan in CAD format, applicable NOCs such as fire/water/pollution/environment, sale deed and Khata certificate as examples of uploads, with requirements depending on the proposal.

Interpretation from sourcesBengaluru, Karnataka, India

Examples are not a universal current checklist; no file was uploaded. The original official endpoint is currently unavailable; this claim is retained as incomplete historical/public evidence, not a current complete procedure. This broad statement is retained only as an unresolved lead after the source-specific citation cap. This broad statement is retained only as an unresolved lead after the source-specific citation cap. This broad statement is retained only as an unresolved lead after the source-specific citation cap.

No source is linked to this statement. It is explicitly marked Unknown.
UnknownNo usable sourceunknown

No reviewed official public source establishes a supplied property's approval jurisdiction, current building category/threshold, professional requirement, current document/NOC checklist, fee, sanction timing, inspection result or issued plan licence.

Interpretation from sourcesBengaluru, Karnataka, India

No architect login, property data, upload, payment, plan submission or case lookup.

No source is linked to this statement. It is explicitly marked Unknown.
R03
documentationunknown

Scrutiny, inspection and sanction unobserved

No project number, scrutiny remark, inspection, demand, payment or licence exists.

Likely cause
These states require a real architect-led application and municipal processing.
What you can try next
Retain project/reference number after an authorised filing; displayed/dated workflows are not approval guarantees.
See evidence
UnknownNo usable sourceunknown

No reviewed official public source establishes a supplied property's approval jurisdiction, current building category/threshold, professional requirement, current document/NOC checklist, fee, sanction timing, inspection result or issued plan licence.

Interpretation from sourcesBengaluru, Karnataka, India

No architect login, property data, upload, payment, plan submission or case lookup.

No source is linked to this statement. It is explicitly marked Unknown.
R04
documentationunknown

Route/category and current GBA mapping

Multiple public route labels and a login-gated legacy BPAS path leave current category/zone routing unknown.

Likely cause
Property facts and GBA/city-corporation transition are not supplied.
What you can try next
Confirm current zone, route and competent authority before architect-led action.
See evidence
UnknownNo usable sourceunknown

The earlier route-label index cited in this atlas could not be independently reproduced from the current public BPAS FAQ.

Interpretation from sourcesBengaluru, Karnataka, India

The prior route-label endpoint is unavailable. Sakala/manual/head-office labels and property applicability remain unverified.

No source is linked to this statement. It is explicitly marked Unknown.
COfficial but incomplete or olderpartial

The official public submission page exposes a BPAS login link, so this public-only pass stops before architect/applicant session entry.

Read directly in a sourceBengaluru, Karnataka, India

No credentials or login attempted. The original official endpoint is currently unavailable; this claim is retained as incomplete historical/public evidence, not a current complete procedure.

UnknownNo usable sourceunknown

Current corporation/zone, route category, professional registration, document/NOC checklist, fee, timings, inspection result and sanction/licence outcome remain Unknown.

Interpretation from sourcesBengaluru, Karnataka, India

No architect login, property data, upload, payment or submission.

No source is linked to this statement. It is explicitly marked Unknown.
R05
documentationunknown

Documents, fee and output unobserved

No drawing, NOC, scrutiny result, inspection, demand, payment or licence exists.

Likely cause
These states require a real architect/applicant submission and municipal processing.
What you can try next
Use current GBA/Town Planning and registered-professional guidance after authorisation; dated BPAS sequence is not a guarantee.
See evidence
COfficial but incomplete or olderpartial

The BPAS sequence names pre-DCR CAD plan, applicable NOCs, sale deed and Khata certificate as upload examples before scrutiny; exact documents depend on the proposal.

Read directly in a sourceBengaluru, Karnataka, India

No drawings or documents selected/uploaded. The original official endpoint is currently unavailable; this claim is retained as incomplete historical/public evidence, not a current complete procedure.

COfficial but incomplete or olderpartial

The dated BPAS workflow says licence fee is calculated by built-up area and that approval produces an online PDF licence; larger general proposals add chief engineer/joint commissioner stages.

Read directly in a sourceBengaluru, Karnataka, India

No fee, payment, authority decision or PDF output exists. The original official endpoint is currently unavailable; this claim is retained as incomplete historical/public evidence, not a current complete procedure.

UnknownNo usable sourceunknown

Current corporation/zone, route category, professional registration, document/NOC checklist, fee, timings, inspection result and sanction/licence outcome remain Unknown.

Interpretation from sourcesBengaluru, Karnataka, India

No architect login, property data, upload, payment or submission.

No source is linked to this statement. It is explicitly marked Unknown.
R06
processpartial

Reported plan application appears pending without a verified cause

A citizen reports a submitted residential plan appearing stuck.

Likely cause
Unknown; the account cannot distinguish jurisdiction, completeness, scrutiny, objection, workflow, or case-specific conditions.
What you can try next
Obtain an authorised case-specific status and written reason through the relevant authority's current route. Do not infer a general approval halt from this account.
See evidence
UnknownNo usable sourceunknown

The citizen accounts do not establish the competent authority, applicable rules, required professional, document set, scrutiny outcome, fee, inspection, licence, or timeline for a particular Bengaluru building-plan case.

Interpretation from sourcesBengaluru, Karnataka, India

No application, upload, payment, inspection request, or case lookup was performed.

No source is linked to this statement. It is explicitly marked Unknown.
R07
documentationpartial

Reported uncertainty about proposal treatment and road classification

A citizen reports conflicting practical expectations around road treatment, floor count and parking for a commercial proposal.

Likely cause
Unknown; the report does not validate road status, applicable rules, proposal details, authority or advice received.
What you can try next
Seek written, authorised clarification from the competent planning authority or a properly qualified professional. Do not use or pay an unofficial route based on this account.
See evidence
ECitizen evidencepartial

One citizen reported being told that how a road adjacent to a commercial proposal was treated could affect the apparent floor and parking options, alongside an alleged unofficial payment demand.

Read directly in a sourceBengaluru, Karnataka, India

A single unverified account. It is not evidence of a rule, entitlement, approved design, official charge, or misconduct determination.

UnknownNo usable sourceunknown

The citizen accounts do not establish the competent authority, applicable rules, required professional, document set, scrutiny outcome, fee, inspection, licence, or timeline for a particular Bengaluru building-plan case.

Interpretation from sourcesBengaluru, Karnataka, India

No application, upload, payment, inspection request, or case lookup was performed.

No source is linked to this statement. It is explicitly marked Unknown.
R08
processunknown

Authenticated case path not publicly verified

The current public entry shows sign-in/CAPTCHA controls, while the live authenticated form, validation and submission result were not observable.

Likely cause
Architect/owner account access and case-specific property/application state are required for the next workflow states.
What you can try next
Use the public FAQ and published architect/helpdesk routes; retain the authenticated form and case outcome as Unknown until an authorised user proceeds.
See evidence
UnknownNo usable sourceunknown

After the public GBA/BPAS entry's sign-in/CAPTCHA boundary, the current authenticated form sequence, validation messages, live submission next step and case-specific recovery remain Unknown in this pass.

Interpretation from sourcesBengaluru, Karnataka, India

The sign-in controls were observed, but no credentials or CAPTCHA were used and no access-control bypass was attempted.

No source is linked to this statement. It is explicitly marked Unknown.
BCurrent official sourceverified

The current public FAQ publishes recovery routes for workflow problems: an architect may email the concerned Building License Department or IT helpdesk if the architect is not cooperating, and an architect with online-filing difficulty may use the helpdesk email/telephone/SMS/EODB support route; the public helpdesk also exposes knowledge-base browse/search and a New ticket form.

Read directly in a sourceBengaluru, Karnataka, India

The FAQ's recovery wording is directed to an architect/LS. The public New ticket form visibly requests an email address and Project No.; no ticket or personal data was entered.

R09
documentationpartial

Document/NOC and scrutiny failure signals

The FAQ lists missing or non-conforming plans, ownership/access records, NOCs and Auto-Scrutiny deviations as common rejection reasons.

Likely cause
The proposal-specific document, drawing and NOC package does not meet the applicable requirements.
What you can try next
Use the published mistake list to correct the package with the authorised professional; no correction or resubmission was performed.
See evidence
UnknownNo usable sourceunknown

The current public FAQ names incomplete mandatory uploads, non-conforming plans, missing applicable NOCs or landowner/access-right documents, invalid ownership documents, Auto-Scrutiny drawing deviations and missing retained-structure evidence as common application-rejection reasons.

Interpretation from sourcesBengaluru, Karnataka, India

These are the FAQ's published common mistakes, not a rejection of a real case. This broad statement is retained only as an unresolved lead after the source-specific citation cap. This broad statement is retained only as an unresolved lead after the source-specific citation cap.

No source is linked to this statement. It is explicitly marked Unknown.
R10
processcontested

Published fee-mode instructions conflict

One current FAQ section says all payments are online, while another lists CFC cash/cheque/DD alongside online payment.

Likely cause
Different FAQ sections or legacy guidance have not been reconciled on the public page.
What you can try next
Obtain current authorised clarification through the published architect/helpdesk route before paying; no payment was attempted.
See evidence
UnknownNo usable sourcecontested

The current public FAQ says scrutiny fee is paid online with the application and other fees are charged through demand notes at construction stages, while another FAQ answer lists cash/cheque/DD at a CFC alongside online payment; the published fee-mode instructions are therefore internally conflicting.

Interpretation from sourcesBengaluru, Karnataka, India

The two statements appear in different FAQ sections on the same current page. No payment method was selected or used. Public FAQ statements are retained as unreconciled guidance; no payment method was attempted. Public FAQ statements are retained as unreconciled guidance; no payment method was attempted. This broad statement is retained only as an unresolved lead after the source-specific citation cap. Public FAQ statements are retained as unreconciled guidance; no payment method was attempted. This broad statement is retained only as an unresolved lead after the source-specific citation cap. Public FAQ statements are retained as unreconciled guidance; no payment method was attempted.

Contested evidenceConflicts with The current public FAQ's building-permit Do's section instructs applicants to make all payments online through net banking or debit/credit card. · The current BPAS FAQ says applicable charges are deposited through online modes such as RTGS, NEFT or net banking and that cash, cheque and demand draft are not accepted.
No source is linked to this statement. It is explicitly marked Unknown.
BCurrent official sourcecontested

The current public FAQ's building-permit Do's section instructs applicants to make all payments online through net banking or debit/credit card.

Read directly in a sourceBengaluru, Karnataka, India

Retained with the separate FAQ payment-mode statement; this pass does not resolve which instruction applies to a current case. Public FAQ statements are retained as unreconciled guidance; no payment method was attempted. Public FAQ statements are retained as unreconciled guidance; no payment method was attempted. Public FAQ statements are retained as unreconciled guidance; no payment method was attempted. Public FAQ statements are retained as unreconciled guidance; no payment method was attempted.

Contested evidenceConflicts with The current public FAQ says scrutiny fee is paid online with the application and other fees are charged through demand notes at construction stages, while another FAQ answer lists cash/cheque/DD at a CFC alongside online payment; the published fee-mode instructions are therefore internally conflicting. · The current BPAS FAQ says applicable charges are deposited through online modes such as RTGS, NEFT or net banking and that cash, cheque and demand draft are not accepted.
BCurrent official sourceverified

The current public FAQ publishes recovery routes for workflow problems: an architect may email the concerned Building License Department or IT helpdesk if the architect is not cooperating, and an architect with online-filing difficulty may use the helpdesk email/telephone/SMS/EODB support route; the public helpdesk also exposes knowledge-base browse/search and a New ticket form.

Read directly in a sourceBengaluru, Karnataka, India

The FAQ's recovery wording is directed to an architect/LS. The public New ticket form visibly requests an email address and Project No.; no ticket or personal data was entered.

R11
processunknown

No case-specific approval outcome

No live project, status result, scrutiny remark, fee demand, payment, inspection, sanction, licence, CC, BCC or OC exists in this public-only pass.

Likely cause
Those states require an authorised route, case data and/or an actual municipal application.
What you can try next
Use a case-specific authorised search or filing and retain the project/reference number; do not treat FAQ stages as a live approval.
See evidence
UnknownNo usable sourceunknown

The public-only pass does not establish the current property-specific corporation/route, required document or NOC set, scrutiny result, rejection text, inspection result, fee demand, payment acceptance, sanction decision or certificate output for any Bengaluru building-plan case; these are Unknown.

Interpretation from sourcesBengaluru, Karnataka, India

No login, property facts, professional selection, document/drawing upload, NOC request, live search, payment or submission was made.

No source is linked to this statement. It is explicitly marked Unknown.
R12
processpartial

Reported approval delay without a verifiable case state

One citizen reported that a building-plan approval had taken almost one month.

Likely cause
Unknown; the account does not reveal the authority, submission date, completeness, scrutiny state, objection, or case-specific link between steps.
What you can try next
Use the competent authority's current, authorised case-status and written-reason route; do not infer a general delay or cause from this account.
See evidence
R13
documentationpartial

Unverified due-diligence lead about map and sanction representations

A prospective buyer reported a public mapping signal that appeared inconsistent with a builder's statement about an approved plan.

Likely cause
Unknown; neither the map record nor the claimed sanction was verified, and the account does not establish how either source should be interpreted for the property.
What you can try next
Obtain authoritative, property-specific records from the responsible agencies and qualified independent review before relying on either representation.
See evidence
ECitizen evidencepartial

One prospective buyer reported that a public mapping application displayed a watercourse signal at a shortlisted apartment site.

Read directly in a sourceBengaluru, Karnataka, India

This preserves a reported interface signal only. It does not establish the map's accuracy, a restriction, or the site's legal status.

ECitizen evidencepartial

The same prospective buyer reported that the builder said the apartment had a BBMP-sanctioned plan and that the mapping result was incorrect.

Read directly in a sourceBengaluru, Karnataka, India

This records a reported builder representation, not proof of a sanction, its validity, the map's inaccuracy, or legality. It is cross-linked because the source presents it as inconsistent with the reported mapping signal.

R14
infrastructurepartial

Reported utility-connection obstacle after plan sanction

One citizen reported a claimed affidavit and certificate-related condition for electricity connection after plan sanction.

Likely cause
Unknown; the citizen account cannot verify the provider's current rule, property category, application completeness, certificate status, or whether the reported condition applied.
What you can try next
Request the current written requirement and case-specific explanation from the relevant provider and planning authority; do not rely on forum advice or an informal intermediary.
See evidence
ECitizen evidencepartial

One citizen reported that, despite a BBMP-sanctioned plan, an electricity provider requested an affidavit concerning a completion-certificate-related condition for connection, including temporary connection.

Read directly in a sourceBengaluru, Karnataka, India

One unverified account of a cross-system link between steps; it does not establish a current provider policy, a certificate requirement, an exemption, or whether the reported account was complete.

05 · Check our sources

Sources for Smaller/Suvarna Paravanige lead

The letter shows source strength, not whether a statement will apply to every case.

Show the sources
UnknownNo usable sourceunknown

The atlas has not independently verified a claim-specific official text for the detailed Section 299 requirements previously summarised here.

Interpretation from sourcesBengaluru, Karnataka, India

The retained India Code entry point is not a claim-specific reproduction of the statutory text.

No source is linked to this statement. It is explicitly marked Unknown.
UnknownNo usable sourceunknown

The current GBA public home lists Building Permission; BBMP's public citizen index lists approval jurisdiction, submission procedure, required documents, NOCs, fees, registered professionals, site inspection, Sakala and FAQ links.

Interpretation from sourcesBengaluru, Karnataka, India

Directory labels only; no live target was opened. The original official endpoint is currently unavailable; this claim is retained as incomplete historical/public evidence, not a current complete procedure. This broad statement is retained only as an unresolved lead after the source-specific citation cap. This broad statement is retained only as an unresolved lead after the source-specific citation cap. This broad statement is retained only as an unresolved lead after the source-specific citation cap.

No source is linked to this statement. It is explicitly marked Unknown.
UnknownNo usable sourceunknown

The BPAS description says building plan approval is administered through town planning across eight BBMP zones and that an owner/applicant files online through a BBMP-registered architect, who creates the file and uploads the plan/documents.

Interpretation from sourcesBengaluru, Karnataka, India

Published 2019 IT description; current GBA/professional registration behavior is unknown. The original official endpoint is currently unavailable; this claim is retained as incomplete historical/public evidence, not a current complete procedure. This broad statement is retained only as an unresolved lead after the source-specific citation cap. This broad statement is retained only as an unresolved lead after the source-specific citation cap. This broad statement is retained only as an unresolved lead after the source-specific citation cap.

No source is linked to this statement. It is explicitly marked Unknown.
UnknownNo usable sourceunknown

The BPAS description names a pre-DCR building plan in CAD format, applicable NOCs such as fire/water/pollution/environment, sale deed and Khata certificate as examples of uploads, with requirements depending on the proposal.

Interpretation from sourcesBengaluru, Karnataka, India

Examples are not a universal current checklist; no file was uploaded. The original official endpoint is currently unavailable; this claim is retained as incomplete historical/public evidence, not a current complete procedure. This broad statement is retained only as an unresolved lead after the source-specific citation cap. This broad statement is retained only as an unresolved lead after the source-specific citation cap. This broad statement is retained only as an unresolved lead after the source-specific citation cap.

No source is linked to this statement. It is explicitly marked Unknown.
UnknownNo usable sourceunknown

The BPAS description says the inward clerk checks documents, an assistant engineer/case worker performs automated DCR scrutiny, gaps may be returned for correction, and an assistant engineer with ADTP conducts site inspection when documents are correct.

Interpretation from sourcesBengaluru, Karnataka, India

Dated workflow description; no scrutiny or inspection occurred. The original official endpoint is currently unavailable; this claim is retained as incomplete historical/public evidence, not a current complete procedure. This broad statement is retained only as an unresolved lead after the source-specific citation cap. This broad statement is retained only as an unresolved lead after the source-specific citation cap. This broad statement is retained only as an unresolved lead after the source-specific citation cap.

No source is linked to this statement. It is explicitly marked Unknown.
UnknownNo usable sourceunknown

The BPAS description says license fee is calculated by built-up area, further approval routes through ADTP and larger general proposals involve chief engineer/joint commissioner, after which an online PDF license is generated/sent.

Interpretation from sourcesBengaluru, Karnataka, India

Fee amount, authority thresholds and current output timing are unknown. The original official endpoint is currently unavailable; this claim is retained as incomplete historical/public evidence, not a current complete procedure. This broad statement is retained only as an unresolved lead after the source-specific citation cap. This broad statement is retained only as an unresolved lead after the source-specific citation cap. This broad statement is retained only as an unresolved lead after the source-specific citation cap.

No source is linked to this statement. It is explicitly marked Unknown.
UnknownNo usable sourceunknown

BBMP's public procedure page labels Sakala manual submission at sub-division office, Suvarna Paravanige and commencement/occupancy certificates at zonal office, and plan sanction at head office, alongside registered-professional links.

Interpretation from sourcesBengaluru, Karnataka, India

Public labels do not prove current eligibility or office routing for a supplied property. The original official endpoint is currently unavailable; this claim is retained as incomplete historical/public evidence, not a current complete procedure. This broad statement is retained only as an unresolved lead after the source-specific citation cap. This broad statement is retained only as an unresolved lead after the source-specific citation cap. This broad statement is retained only as an unresolved lead after the source-specific citation cap.

No source is linked to this statement. It is explicitly marked Unknown.
UnknownNo usable sourceunknown

No reviewed official public source establishes a supplied property's approval jurisdiction, current building category/threshold, professional requirement, current document/NOC checklist, fee, sanction timing, inspection result or issued plan licence.

Interpretation from sourcesBengaluru, Karnataka, India

No architect login, property data, upload, payment, plan submission or case lookup.

No source is linked to this statement. It is explicitly marked Unknown.
UnknownNo usable sourceunknown

The earlier route-label index cited in this atlas could not be independently reproduced from the current public BPAS FAQ.

Interpretation from sourcesBengaluru, Karnataka, India

The prior route-label endpoint is unavailable. Sakala/manual/head-office labels and property applicability remain unverified.

No source is linked to this statement. It is explicitly marked Unknown.
COfficial but incomplete or olderpartial

The BPAS public description routes online application/file creation through a BBMP-registered architect and identifies the architect/applicant as the external user.

Read directly in a sourceBengaluru, Karnataka, India

Dated description; current GBA professional route unknown. The original official endpoint is currently unavailable; this claim is retained as incomplete historical/public evidence, not a current complete procedure.

COfficial but incomplete or olderpartial

The BPAS sequence names pre-DCR CAD plan, applicable NOCs, sale deed and Khata certificate as upload examples before scrutiny; exact documents depend on the proposal.

Read directly in a sourceBengaluru, Karnataka, India

No drawings or documents selected/uploaded. The original official endpoint is currently unavailable; this claim is retained as incomplete historical/public evidence, not a current complete procedure.

COfficial but incomplete or olderpartial

The dated BPAS workflow describes inward document checking, automated DCR scrutiny, return/correction for gaps, then AE/ADTP site inspection when documents are correct.

Read directly in a sourceBengaluru, Karnataka, India

No scrutiny, return or inspection observed. The original official endpoint is currently unavailable; this claim is retained as incomplete historical/public evidence, not a current complete procedure.

COfficial but incomplete or olderpartial

The dated BPAS workflow says licence fee is calculated by built-up area and that approval produces an online PDF licence; larger general proposals add chief engineer/joint commissioner stages.

Read directly in a sourceBengaluru, Karnataka, India

No fee, payment, authority decision or PDF output exists. The original official endpoint is currently unavailable; this claim is retained as incomplete historical/public evidence, not a current complete procedure.

COfficial but incomplete or olderpartial

The official public submission page exposes a BPAS login link, so this public-only pass stops before architect/applicant session entry.

Read directly in a sourceBengaluru, Karnataka, India

No credentials or login attempted. The original official endpoint is currently unavailable; this claim is retained as incomplete historical/public evidence, not a current complete procedure.

UnknownNo usable sourceunknown

Current corporation/zone, route category, professional registration, document/NOC checklist, fee, timings, inspection result and sanction/licence outcome remain Unknown.

Interpretation from sourcesBengaluru, Karnataka, India

No architect login, property data, upload, payment or submission.

No source is linked to this statement. It is explicitly marked Unknown.
ECitizen evidencepartial

One citizen reported being told that how a road adjacent to a commercial proposal was treated could affect the apparent floor and parking options, alongside an alleged unofficial payment demand.

Read directly in a sourceBengaluru, Karnataka, India

A single unverified account. It is not evidence of a rule, entitlement, approved design, official charge, or misconduct determination.

UnknownNo usable sourceunknown

The citizen accounts do not establish the competent authority, applicable rules, required professional, document set, scrutiny outcome, fee, inspection, licence, or timeline for a particular Bengaluru building-plan case.

Interpretation from sourcesBengaluru, Karnataka, India

No application, upload, payment, inspection request, or case lookup was performed.

No source is linked to this statement. It is explicitly marked Unknown.
BCurrent official sourceverified

The public BPAS/GBA entry page describes a single-window clearance system for Greater Bengaluru Authority construction permits and says certificates are online digitally signed certificates.

Read directly in a sourceBengaluru, Karnataka, India

Current public page observation; it does not prove that every permit category or certificate is available without an authenticated professional/applicant session.

BCurrent official sourceverified

The current BPAS FAQ says a building-permission applicant applies online with requisite documents and PreDCR drawings through empanelled professionals on the BBMP portal.

Read directly in a sourceBengaluru, Karnataka, India

The FAQ states the professional-led route; no professional was selected and no application was created.

UnknownNo usable sourceunknown

The current BPAS FAQ says the architect fills a Common Application Form with plot and professional details including owner, plot size, colony category, zone and consultant details, and that relevant information is transferred to external agencies for NOCs as required.

Interpretation from sourcesBengaluru, Karnataka, India

This records the FAQ description, not the fields or NOC result for a particular case. This broad statement is retained only as an unresolved lead after the source-specific citation cap. This broad statement is retained only as an unresolved lead after the source-specific citation cap. This broad statement is retained only as an unresolved lead after the source-specific citation cap.

No source is linked to this statement. It is explicitly marked Unknown.
UnknownNo usable sourceunknown

The current BPAS FAQ lists plans and drawings, ownership documents, Khata extract/certificate, up-to-date tax receipt, and digitally signed professional/safety/supervision/debris-removal/indemnity declarations as CAF document leads.

Interpretation from sourcesBengaluru, Karnataka, India

The FAQ presents these as CAF document leads; exact requiredness remains proposal-specific. This broad statement is retained only as an unresolved lead after the source-specific citation cap.

No source is linked to this statement. It is explicitly marked Unknown.
BCurrent official sourceverified

The current BPAS FAQ says NOC requirements depend on plot size, location, building type and height, and gives examples including aviation/fire/BESCOM for buildings at least 15 m, KSPCB/BWSSB for larger built-up area or 20-plus dwelling-unit residential proposals, SEIAA above 20,000 sq m, and BMRCL when a site abuts a proposed metro line.

Read directly in a sourceBengaluru, Karnataka, India

The thresholds and agency examples are transcribed from the current FAQ; no property facts were supplied to select an NOC.

UnknownNo usable sourceunknown

The current BPAS FAQ says applicants do not need separate applications for listed inter-departmental NOCs because the single-window system transmits the relevant information to concerned agencies; it also says online communication is used for inspection scheduling.

Interpretation from sourcesBengaluru, Karnataka, India

The FAQ describes system routing; no NOC request or inspection event was initiated. This broad statement is retained only as an unresolved lead after the source-specific citation cap. This broad statement is retained only as an unresolved lead after the source-specific citation cap. This broad statement is retained only as an unresolved lead after the source-specific citation cap.

No source is linked to this statement. It is explicitly marked Unknown.
BCurrent official sourceverified

The current BPAS FAQ lists eight construction-permit steps: online CAF, online sanction including required external NOCs, payment and release of the sanctioned plan, plinth-level commencement application, commencement certificate, occupancy CAF, BBMP/NOC-agency inspection, and applicable compounding-fee/charge intimation with occupancy-certificate release.

Read directly in a sourceBengaluru, Karnataka, India

Published sequence includes later CC/OC stages; this pass concerns plan approval and did not proceed into a live case.

UnknownNo usable sourceunknown

The current BPAS FAQ says scrutiny fee is paid online with the application and other fees are paid against demand notes generated at plan-sanction, commencement-certificate and occupancy-certificate stages.

Interpretation from sourcesBengaluru, Karnataka, India

No amount, demand note or payment was generated for a case. This broad statement is retained only as an unresolved lead after the source-specific citation cap. This broad statement is retained only as an unresolved lead after the source-specific citation cap. This broad statement is retained only as an unresolved lead after the source-specific citation cap.

No source is linked to this statement. It is explicitly marked Unknown.
BCurrent official sourcecontested

The current BPAS FAQ says applicable charges are deposited through online modes such as RTGS, NEFT or net banking and that cash, cheque and demand draft are not accepted.

Read directly in a sourceBengaluru, Karnataka, India

This current FAQ statement is recorded separately from older workflow documents that mention demand drafts; no payment method was tested. Public FAQ statements are retained as unreconciled guidance; no payment method was attempted. Public FAQ statements are retained as unreconciled guidance; no payment method was attempted. Public FAQ statements are retained as unreconciled guidance; no payment method was attempted. Public FAQ statements are retained as unreconciled guidance; no payment method was attempted.

Contested evidenceConflicts with The current public FAQ says scrutiny fee is paid online with the application and other fees are charged through demand notes at construction stages, while another FAQ answer lists cash/cheque/DD at a CFC alongside online payment; the published fee-mode instructions are therefore internally conflicting. · The current public FAQ's building-permit Do's section instructs applicants to make all payments online through net banking or debit/credit card.
UnknownNo usable sourceunknown

The current BPAS FAQ publishes risk categories B1 through B5 using plot size, height and floors for residential and non-residential buildings, and gives separate head-office and zonal-office working-day totals for plan sanction and later certificates.

Interpretation from sourcesBengaluru, Karnataka, India

The FAQ matrix is not used to classify an unknown property. The published totals range by risk and office; no sanction-time guarantee is inferred. This broad statement is retained only as an unresolved lead after the source-specific citation cap. This broad statement is retained only as an unresolved lead after the source-specific citation cap. This broad statement is retained only as an unresolved lead after the source-specific citation cap.

No source is linked to this statement. It is explicitly marked Unknown.
BCurrent official sourcepartial

The public Suvarna Paravanige procedure PDF describes zonal-office residential building-plan sanction for a site area up to 4,000 sq ft, up to four dwelling units and up to 15 m height, with online filing plus hard-copy records/drawings, scrutiny/processing charge, inspection, document/drawing verification, demand note, fee receipt and approval/rejection steps.

Read directly in a sourceBengaluru, Karnataka, India

This is what the public procedure document states; it is not a property-specific eligibility decision and does not override current portal validation.

BCurrent official sourceverified

The public Suvarna Paravanige procedure PDF lists latest Khata certificate/extract, latest tax receipt, sale/title deed, encumbrance certificate, conversion or land-use documents where applicable, revenue sketch where applicable, detailed building plan and architect licence copy as documents to enclose.

Read directly in a sourceBengaluru, Karnataka, India

The document describes enclosure leads and uses 'wherever applicable'; no file was selected or uploaded.

BCurrent official sourceverified

The public BPAS Plan Sanction checklist contains fields for applicant/site, BDA layout, plot-area comparisons, RMP-2015 land use, conversion and revenue records, Khata and tax receipt, prior sanction, Metro NOC, NOC details, inspection date, road width, site features, FAR/plinth/built-up area, floors/height, buffers and zoning-regulation comparisons.

Read directly in a sourceBengaluru, Karnataka, India

Direct checklist observation; the PDF does not establish that every listed field applies to every proposal.

BCurrent official sourceverified

The current BPAS downloads page publicly lists a Plan Approval manual, Plan Sanction checklist, Schedule-II prescribed application, Schedule-III supervision form, professional/owner affidavits, bonds and Nambike Nakshe/Single Plot Approval forms.

Read directly in a sourceBengaluru, Karnataka, India

The page lists public downloads; individual form eligibility and current submission behavior remain unverified.

COfficial but incomplete or olderpartial

The official BPAS Plan Approval Manual describes an authenticated architect workflow with project creation, applicant/consultant and plot/building details, document attachment, geolocation, application-type selection, drawing upload and AutoDCR scrutiny, NOC/document attachment, challan and final submission.

Read directly in a sourceBengaluru, Karnataka, India

The manual revision history ends 27-08-2020. It is retained as dated official guidance, not proof of current authenticated UI or sequence.

COfficial but incomplete or olderpartial

The official site-inspection procedure document states inspection schedules of within 7 days for head-office plan sanction and within 3 days for zonal-office plan sanction, with inspection-report publication within 48 hours and 24 hours respectively.

Read directly in a sourceBengaluru, Karnataka, India

Older official procedure; no current inspection appointment or report was observed.

BCurrent official sourceverified

The public BPAS fee calculator exposes service, use, built-up-area, building-type, dwelling-unit, locality and category inputs and budget-head estimates including scrutiny fee, ground rent, KTCP/betterment, security deposit, road-cutting, labour cess and licence fee.

Read directly in a sourceBengaluru, Karnataka, India

Current blank calculator surface only; no amount is asserted for an individual proposal.

BCurrent official sourceverified

The public BPAS Citizen Search surface exposes project/proposal number, zone, ward, plot, CTS, applicant, architect/L.E./S.E. and View Application fields/columns.

Read directly in a sourceBengaluru, Karnataka, India

Public controls were observed without entering an identifier; no application result or licence was retrieved.

UnknownNo usable sourceunknown

No reviewed official public source establishes the correct route, current professional requirement, applicable document/NOC set, fee demand, scrutiny remark, inspection result, sanction decision or issued licence for a particular Bengaluru property without property and authenticated application data.

Interpretation from sourcesBengaluru, Karnataka, India

Public pages and documents were reviewed, but no login, property identifier, upload, payment, submission or case lookup was performed.

No source is linked to this statement. It is explicitly marked Unknown.
BCurrent official sourceverified

The current unauthenticated GBA BPAS entry displays five Bengaluru city-corporation choices, a username/password/CAPTCHA sign-in surface, Citizen Search and Owner Search labels, project/owner-mobile fields, and an e-Khata mandatory notice for Building Licence, Plinth Certificate and Occupancy Certificate applications from 1 July 2025.

Read directly in a sourceBengaluru, Karnataka, India

Direct public-page observation on 2026-08-31. No sign-in, CAPTCHA, identifier or search was used.

UnknownNo usable sourceunknown

The current public FAQ says an applicant obtains building permission online with requisite documents and PreDCR drawings through an empanelled professional, and that the architect completes a Common Application Form containing plot and professional details.

Interpretation from sourcesBengaluru, Karnataka, India

The FAQ wording is recorded as published guidance; no professional was selected and no CAF was opened or completed. This broad statement is retained only as an unresolved lead after the source-specific citation cap. This broad statement is retained only as an unresolved lead after the source-specific citation cap. This broad statement is retained only as an unresolved lead after the source-specific citation cap.

No source is linked to this statement. It is explicitly marked Unknown.
UnknownNo usable sourceunknown

The current public FAQ lists plans/drawings, ownership documents, Khata extract or certificate and current tax receipt, plus digitally signed professional/safety declarations, and says NOCs depend on plot size, location, building type and height.

Interpretation from sourcesBengaluru, Karnataka, India

The page supplies examples and a link between steps table, not a property-specific checklist. No document, drawing or NOC was uploaded. This broad statement is retained only as an unresolved lead after the source-specific citation cap. This broad statement is retained only as an unresolved lead after the source-specific citation cap.

No source is linked to this statement. It is explicitly marked Unknown.
UnknownNo usable sourceunknown

The current public FAQ names incomplete mandatory uploads, non-conforming plans, missing applicable NOCs or landowner/access-right documents, invalid ownership documents, Auto-Scrutiny drawing deviations and missing retained-structure evidence as common application-rejection reasons.

Interpretation from sourcesBengaluru, Karnataka, India

These are the FAQ's published common mistakes, not a rejection of a real case. This broad statement is retained only as an unresolved lead after the source-specific citation cap. This broad statement is retained only as an unresolved lead after the source-specific citation cap.

No source is linked to this statement. It is explicitly marked Unknown.
UnknownNo usable sourceunknown

The current public FAQ publishes building-permit stages including Concession, Concession order, IOD, First CC, Further CC, BCC and OCC, and says a citizen-search route can use file number, applicant, architect, zone, ward or plot/location fields to look up a file.

Interpretation from sourcesBengaluru, Karnataka, India

The search fields and stage labels were read from public FAQ text only; no identifier or live case lookup was performed. This broad statement is retained only as an unresolved lead after the source-specific citation cap. This broad statement is retained only as an unresolved lead after the source-specific citation cap. This broad statement is retained only as an unresolved lead after the source-specific citation cap.

No source is linked to this statement. It is explicitly marked Unknown.
UnknownNo usable sourcecontested

The current public FAQ says scrutiny fee is paid online with the application and other fees are charged through demand notes at construction stages, while another FAQ answer lists cash/cheque/DD at a CFC alongside online payment; the published fee-mode instructions are therefore internally conflicting.

Interpretation from sourcesBengaluru, Karnataka, India

The two statements appear in different FAQ sections on the same current page. No payment method was selected or used. Public FAQ statements are retained as unreconciled guidance; no payment method was attempted. Public FAQ statements are retained as unreconciled guidance; no payment method was attempted. This broad statement is retained only as an unresolved lead after the source-specific citation cap. Public FAQ statements are retained as unreconciled guidance; no payment method was attempted. This broad statement is retained only as an unresolved lead after the source-specific citation cap. Public FAQ statements are retained as unreconciled guidance; no payment method was attempted.

Contested evidenceConflicts with The current public FAQ's building-permit Do's section instructs applicants to make all payments online through net banking or debit/credit card. · The current BPAS FAQ says applicable charges are deposited through online modes such as RTGS, NEFT or net banking and that cash, cheque and demand draft are not accepted.
No source is linked to this statement. It is explicitly marked Unknown.
BCurrent official sourcecontested

The current public FAQ's building-permit Do's section instructs applicants to make all payments online through net banking or debit/credit card.

Read directly in a sourceBengaluru, Karnataka, India

Retained with the separate FAQ payment-mode statement; this pass does not resolve which instruction applies to a current case. Public FAQ statements are retained as unreconciled guidance; no payment method was attempted. Public FAQ statements are retained as unreconciled guidance; no payment method was attempted. Public FAQ statements are retained as unreconciled guidance; no payment method was attempted. Public FAQ statements are retained as unreconciled guidance; no payment method was attempted.

Contested evidenceConflicts with The current public FAQ says scrutiny fee is paid online with the application and other fees are charged through demand notes at construction stages, while another FAQ answer lists cash/cheque/DD at a CFC alongside online payment; the published fee-mode instructions are therefore internally conflicting. · The current BPAS FAQ says applicable charges are deposited through online modes such as RTGS, NEFT or net banking and that cash, cheque and demand draft are not accepted.
BCurrent official sourceverified

The current public FAQ publishes recovery routes for workflow problems: an architect may email the concerned Building License Department or IT helpdesk if the architect is not cooperating, and an architect with online-filing difficulty may use the helpdesk email/telephone/SMS/EODB support route; the public helpdesk also exposes knowledge-base browse/search and a New ticket form.

Read directly in a sourceBengaluru, Karnataka, India

The FAQ's recovery wording is directed to an architect/LS. The public New ticket form visibly requests an email address and Project No.; no ticket or personal data was entered.

UnknownNo usable sourceunknown

The public-only pass does not establish the current property-specific corporation/route, required document or NOC set, scrutiny result, rejection text, inspection result, fee demand, payment acceptance, sanction decision or certificate output for any Bengaluru building-plan case; these are Unknown.

Interpretation from sourcesBengaluru, Karnataka, India

No login, property facts, professional selection, document/drawing upload, NOC request, live search, payment or submission was made.

No source is linked to this statement. It is explicitly marked Unknown.
UnknownNo usable sourceunknown

After the public GBA/BPAS entry's sign-in/CAPTCHA boundary, the current authenticated form sequence, validation messages, live submission next step and case-specific recovery remain Unknown in this pass.

Interpretation from sourcesBengaluru, Karnataka, India

The sign-in controls were observed, but no credentials or CAPTCHA were used and no access-control bypass was attempted.

No source is linked to this statement. It is explicitly marked Unknown.
ECitizen evidencepartial

One prospective buyer reported that a public mapping application displayed a watercourse signal at a shortlisted apartment site.

Read directly in a sourceBengaluru, Karnataka, India

This preserves a reported interface signal only. It does not establish the map's accuracy, a restriction, or the site's legal status.

ECitizen evidencepartial

The same prospective buyer reported that the builder said the apartment had a BBMP-sanctioned plan and that the mapping result was incorrect.

Read directly in a sourceBengaluru, Karnataka, India

This records a reported builder representation, not proof of a sanction, its validity, the map's inaccuracy, or legality. It is cross-linked because the source presents it as inconsistent with the reported mapping signal.

ECitizen evidencepartial

One citizen reported that, despite a BBMP-sanctioned plan, an electricity provider requested an affidavit concerning a completion-certificate-related condition for connection, including temporary connection.

Read directly in a sourceBengaluru, Karnataka, India

One unverified account of a cross-system link between steps; it does not establish a current provider policy, a certificate requirement, an exemption, or whether the reported account was complete.

What official documentation exists — and where it stops

What official documentation exists — and where it stops

12 documents · 2 general references · 5 citizen accounts · 10 missing procedures. Sources are grouped by specificity: each URL appears once; general references are starting points, and citizen accounts are reported experience.

Show the sources

Specific documents

12
BPAS/GBA public construction-permit entry — Nambike NaksheGreater Bengaluru Authority / BBMP · accessed 2026-08-31 · Grade B

What it covers: A specific public document or page used to support this entry.

Cited for: The official public submission page exposes a BPAS login link, so this public-only pass stops before architect/applicant session entry. · The public BPAS/GBA entry page describes a single-window clearance system for Greater Bengaluru Authority construction permits and says certificates are online digitally signed certificates. · +3 more statements

Where it stops: Current public page observed 2026-08-31. It shows single-window construction permits, online digitally signed certificates, five city corporations, sign-in fields with CAPTCHA, public search/registration/payment links, and the message that e-Khata is mandatory for Building Licence, Plinth Certificate, and Occupancy Certificate applications from 1 July 2025. No login or value entry was attempted.

BPAS/GBA building-permit FAQGreater Bengaluru Authority / BBMP · accessed 2026-08-31 · Grade B

What it covers: A specific public document or page used to support this entry.

Cited for: The current BPAS FAQ says a building-permission applicant applies online with requisite documents and PreDCR drawings through empanelled professionals on the BBMP portal. · The current BPAS FAQ says NOC requirements depend on plot size, location, building type and height, and gives examples including aviation/fire/BESCOM for buildings at least 15 m, KSPCB/BWSSB for larger built-up area or 20-plus dwelling-unit residential proposals, SEIAA above 20,000 sq m, and BMRCL when a site abuts a proposed metro line. · +3 more statements

Where it stops: Current public FAQ observed 2026-08-31. It covers professional-led online filing, CAF fields, document/NOC leads, risk classification, eight construction-permit steps, payment mode, timelines, tracking, common rejection reasons, and single-window NOC handling. The FAQ contains older terminology and linked legacy references; claims are limited to what the page presently states.

BPAS public downloads, manuals, forms and checklist directoryGreater Bengaluru Authority / BBMP · accessed 2026-08-31 · Grade B

What it covers: A specific public document or page used to support this entry.

Cited for: The current BPAS downloads page publicly lists a Plan Approval manual, Plan Sanction checklist, Schedule-II prescribed application, Schedule-III supervision form, professional/owner affidavits, bonds and Nambike Nakshe/Single Plot Approval forms.

Where it stops: Current public downloads page observed 2026-08-31. It lists the Plan Approval manual, architect utility/help, Plan Sanction checklist, Schedule-II and Schedule-III, affidavits/bonds, Nambike Nakshe and Single Plot Approval forms, and zone GIS PDFs. Listing a file does not prove current eligibility or a completed application.

Checklist for Building Plan SanctionGreater Bengaluru Authority / BBMP · accessed 2026-08-31 · Grade B

What it covers: A specific public document or page used to support this entry.

Cited for: The public BPAS Plan Sanction checklist contains fields for applicant/site, BDA layout, plot-area comparisons, RMP-2015 land use, conversion and revenue records, Khata and tax receipt, prior sanction, Metro NOC, NOC details, inspection date, road width, site features, FAR/plinth/built-up area, floors/height, buffers and zoning-regulation comparisons.

Where it stops: Direct public three-page checklist PDF observed 2026-08-31. It has fields for applicant/site, BDA layout, plot-area comparisons, RMP-2015 land use, conversion and revenue documents, Khata and tax receipt, earlier sanction, Metro NOC, NOC details, inspection date, road width, site/physical features, FAR/plinth/built-up area, floors/height, buffers, rainwater harvesting, solar, trees, solid waste, STP, transformer yard, and zoning-regulation comparison. It is a checklist example, not a property-specific determination.

User Manual for Licensed Architect (Applicant) — BPAS Plan ApprovalBruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike IT Department · accessed 2026-08-31 · Grade C

What it covers: A specific public document or page used to support this entry.

Cited for: The BPAS public description routes online application/file creation through a BBMP-registered architect and identifies the architect/applicant as the external user. · The BPAS sequence names pre-DCR CAD plan, applicable NOCs, sale deed and Khata certificate as upload examples before scrutiny; exact documents depend on the proposal. · +3 more statements

Where it stops: Direct official PDF. Revision history ends at version 2.1 dated 27-08-2020. It documents authenticated architect registration, project creation, applicant/consultant details, document and geolocation tabs, application type selection, drawing upload/AutoDCR scrutiny, NOC and document attachment, site progress, challan, final submission, and proposal-flow checks. No authenticated action was performed.

Suvarna Paravanige — Town Planning Section, Zonal OfficeBruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike · accessed 2026-08-31 · Grade B

What it covers: A specific public document or page used to support this entry.

Cited for: The public Suvarna Paravanige procedure PDF describes zonal-office residential building-plan sanction for a site area up to 4,000 sq ft, up to four dwelling units and up to 15 m height, with online filing plus hard-copy records/drawings, scrutiny/processing charge, inspection, document/drawing verification, demand note, fee receipt and approval/rejection steps. · The public Suvarna Paravanige procedure PDF lists latest Khata certificate/extract, latest tax receipt, sale/title deed, encumbrance certificate, conversion or land-use documents where applicable, revenue sketch where applicable, detailed building plan and architect licence copy as documents to enclose. · +1 more statements

Where it stops: Direct official procedure PDF observed through the public BBMP document route. It describes residential sanction on a site area up to 4,000 sq ft, single BF+GF+3 upper floors, up to 4 dwelling units and height up to 15 m; names the zonal ADTP/designated office; lists online filing plus hard-copy records/drawings, 5% scrutiny/processing charge, inspection, document/drawing verification, demand note, fee receipt and approval/rejection; names form and document leads; and states 10 working days. The document does not resolve current property-specific eligibility or implementation.

Procedure for Site Inspection — Building Plan ApprovalBruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike · accessed 2026-08-31 · Grade C

What it covers: A specific public document or page used to support this entry.

Cited for: The official site-inspection procedure document states inspection schedules of within 7 days for head-office plan sanction and within 3 days for zonal-office plan sanction, with inspection-report publication within 48 hours and 24 hours respectively.

Where it stops: Direct official site-inspection procedure PDF. The published table states inspection within 7 days of application for head-office plan sanction and within 3 days for zonal-office plan sanction, with publication of reports within 48 hours and 24 hours respectively; it also includes an inspection-report template. Search results identify the document as older guidance, so no current SLA is asserted.

BBMP/GBA construction-permit fee calculatorGreater Bengaluru Authority / BBMP · accessed 2026-08-31 · Grade B

What it covers: A specific public document or page used to support this entry.

Cited for: The public BPAS fee calculator exposes service, use, built-up-area, building-type, dwelling-unit, locality and category inputs and budget-head estimates including scrutiny fee, ground rent, KTCP/betterment, security deposit, road-cutting, labour cess and licence fee.

Where it stops: Current public calculator observed 2026-08-31. It exposes service, use, built-up-area, building-type, dwelling-unit, locality and category controls and budget-head fields for scrutiny fee, ground rent, KTCP fee/betterment, security deposit, road cutting, labour cess, licence fee and related charges. Blank controls showed zero estimates; no property values were entered.

BPAS Citizen SearchGreater Bengaluru Authority / BBMP · accessed 2026-08-31 · Grade B

What it covers: A specific public document or page used to support this entry.

Cited for: The public BPAS Citizen Search surface exposes project/proposal number, zone, ward, plot, CTS, applicant, architect/L.E./S.E. and View Application fields/columns.

Where it stops: Public search surface observed 2026-08-31. Its visible fields/columns include project or proposal number, zone, ward, plot number, CTS number, applicant name, architect/L.E./S.E. name, and View Application. No search value or case was submitted.

BPAS Building Licence Cell contact pageGreater Bengaluru Authority / BBMP · accessed 2026-08-31 · Grade B

What it covers: A specific public document or page used to support this entry.

Cited for: The public BPAS contact page lists Building Licence Cell leadership and zonal Assistant Director contacts for South, East, Dasarahalli, Rajarajeshwari Nagara and Mahadevapura.

Where it stops: Current public contact page observed 2026-08-31. It lists the Additional Director and Joint Directors for the Building Licence Cell plus zonal Assistant Director contacts for South, East, Dasarahalli, Rajarajeshwari Nagara and Mahadevapura. It does not establish which officer owns a particular property or a response time.

GBA BPAS Helpdesk knowledge base — current observationGreater Bengaluru Authority / Government of Karnataka · accessed 2026-08-31 · Grade Unknown

What it covers: A specific public document or page used to support this entry.

Where it stops: Unauthenticated helpdesk page observation. Public knowledge-base browse/search is visible, with categories for payment issues, pre-sales questions and technical bug reports; the page also exposes a New ticket route and a sign-in control. No ticket or personal information was submitted.

GBA BPAS Helpdesk New Ticket — current observationGreater Bengaluru Authority / Government of Karnataka · accessed 2026-08-31 · Grade B

What it covers: A specific public document or page used to support this entry.

Cited for: The current public FAQ publishes recovery routes for workflow problems: an architect may email the concerned Building License Department or IT helpdesk if the architect is not cooperating, and an architect with online-filing difficulty may use the helpdesk email/telephone/SMS/EODB support route; the public helpdesk also exposes knowledge-base browse/search and a New ticket form.

Where it stops: Unauthenticated New ticket page observation. The form displays Your email address, Subject, category/attachment controls and Project No. fields, plus the public knowledge-base/sign-in navigation. No fields were filled and no ticket was submitted.

General references

2
General-site reference — Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976 — India CodeGovernment of Karnataka / India Code · accessed 2026-08-28 · Grade Unknown

General reference: This is a starting point, not a source specific to one step.

Where it stops: Official Act record; section 299 application/document requirement is the statutory basis. Legacy official endpoint was unavailable in the 2026-08-28 citation check; this live official entry point identifies the responsible service but does not reproduce every captured detail. This is a general-site reference, not claim-specific evidence. A more specific public document or endpoint was not verified on 2026-08-29; wording that depends only on this source is retained at Grade C or Unknown. IND-54: no claim-specific public URL could be located and verified on 2026-08-31; retained solely as a Grade C general-site reference.

General-site reference — Greater Bengaluru Authority public homeGovernment of Karnataka / GBA · accessed 2026-08-28 · Grade Unknown

General reference: This is a starting point, not a source specific to one step.

Where it stops: Current public directory lists Building Permission. This is a general-site reference, not claim-specific evidence. A more specific public document or endpoint was not verified on 2026-08-29; wording that depends only on this source is retained at Grade C or Unknown. IND-54: no claim-specific public URL could be located and verified on 2026-08-31; retained solely as a Grade C general-site reference.

Citizen accounts

5
Has BBMP slowed down or stopped building plan approvals?r/indianrealestate (Reddit) · accessed 2026-08-28 · Grade E

Reported experience: This is a public first-person account, not an official document.

Cited for: One citizen reported that a residential building-plan application appeared stuck after submission.

Where it stops: A citizen reports having applied for a small residential plan and perceiving the approval as stuck. The post does not establish the application date, jurisdiction, completeness, scrutiny state, cause, or current BBMP approval volume.

Asked to pay bribe for construction permission...Again! :Dr/Bengaluru (Reddit) · accessed 2026-08-28 · Grade E

Reported experience: This is a public first-person account, not an official document.

Cited for: One citizen reported being told that how a road adjacent to a commercial proposal was treated could affect the apparent floor and parking options, alongside an alleged unofficial payment demand.

Where it stops: A citizen constructing a commercial building reports being told that treatment of a nearby road could affect the apparent proposal and reports an unofficial payment demand. The account is unverified and does not establish any road-classification rule, permission entitlement, official fee, or misconduct finding.

Key Documents to check while buying a home in benguluru.r/BangaloreRealEstates (Reddit) · accessed 2026-08-31 · Grade E

Reported experience: This is a public first-person account, not an official document.

Cited for: One citizen reported that their building-plan approval had taken almost one month.

Where it stops: A public first-person comment reports that building-plan approval had taken almost one month. Username, property, application and other personal details are intentionally omitted. The comment does not identify the competent authority, application stage, document completeness, case status, cause, or applicable timeline.

Planning to buy an apartment which has BBMP approved plan, but Dishank app shows raja kaluve passing through itr/indianrealestate (Reddit) · accessed 2026-08-31 · Grade E

Reported experience: This is a public first-person account, not an official document.

Cited for: One prospective buyer reported that a public mapping application displayed a watercourse signal at a shortlisted apartment site. · The same prospective buyer reported that the builder said the apartment had a BBMP-sanctioned plan and that the mapping result was incorrect.

Where it stops: A public first-person prospective-buyer post reports an apparent mismatch between a public mapping result and a builder's statement about a BBMP-sanctioned plan. Username, locality, builder, property and map details are intentionally omitted. Neither representation was independently verified.

BBMP : OC Certificate mandatory for BWSSB and BESCOMr/indianrealestate (Reddit) · accessed 2026-08-31 · Grade E

Reported experience: This is a public first-person account, not an official document.

Cited for: One citizen reported that, despite a BBMP-sanctioned plan, an electricity provider requested an affidavit concerning a completion-certificate-related condition for connection, including temporary connection.

Where it stops: A public first-person commenter reports having a BBMP-sanctioned plan while encountering a claimed affidavit/CC link between steps for an electricity connection, including a temporary connection. Username, plot size, address, blueprint and all other personal details are intentionally omitted. The reported request, requirements, eligibility, and later outcome are unverified.